Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Mini oral session

4MO - Multi-focal genomic dissection of synchronous primary and metastatic tissue from de novo metastatic prostate cancer

Date

16 Oct 2022

Session

Mini oral session

Topics

Clinical Research;  Cancer Biology;  Translational Research;  Genetic and Genomic Testing

Tumour Site

Prostate Cancer

Presenters

Andrew Murtha

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2022) 33 (suppl_8): S1383-S1430. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1095

Authors

A.J. Murtha1, E. Warner2, K. van der Eecken3, E. Kwan2, C. Herberts2, J. Sipola4, S. Ng5, E. Chen2, N. Fonseca2, E. Schönlau2, C. Bernales2, G. Donnellan2, S. Verbeke3, N. Lumen3, J. Van Dorpe3, B. De Laere3, M. Annala4, G. Vandekerkhove2, P. Ost3, A.W. Wyatt2

Author affiliations

  • 1 UBC - The University of British Columbia, Vancouver/CA
  • 2 UBC - University of British Columbia - Faculty of Medicine, Vancouver/CA
  • 3 UZ Gent - University Hospital Ghent, Gent/BE
  • 4 University and Tays Cancer Center, Tampere/FI
  • 5 UBC - University of British Columbia - Faculty of Medicine, V6T 1Z3 - Vancouver/CA

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract 4MO

Background

De novo metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) is highly aggressive, but the lack of routine tumour tissue in this setting hinders genomic stratification and jeopardizes precision oncology efforts. Accurate molecular profiling at diagnosis is imperative for genomics-informed risk stratification and biomarker-guided treatment. Currently, it is unclear the extent that intrapatient heterogeneity impacts clinical cancer genotyping.

Methods

We performed genomic profiling of 607 synchronous primary foci, metastatic lesions, and cell-free DNA from a rare clinical trial cohort of 43 de novo mCSPC patients who underwent radical prostatectomy at diagnosis. Surgery is not currently standard practice in this disease setting. All samples were subjected to targeted DNA sequencing using a bespoke prostate cancer-specific panel and/or whole-exome sequencing.

Results

Sequencing-derived tissue tumour fraction was heterogeneous and low across same-patient foci in ∼20% of patients. In samples with high tumour fraction, the genomic landscape of mCSPC closely resembled metastatic treatment-resistant prostate cancer. In same-patient samples, intra-prostate heterogeneity in mutation, copy number, and whole-genome duplication status was pervasive. Phylogenetic modelling demonstrated additional complexity in several patients driven by polyclonal metastatic seeding from the reservoir of primary populations. While the metastatic clones were often identified in the primary site, frequent discordance between select primary foci and synchronous metastases in clinically-relevant genes, plus highly variable per-sample tumour fraction, resulted in false genotyping of the dominant disease, when relying on a single tissue focus. However, in silico modelling demonstrated that analysis of multiple prostate diagnostic biopsy cores can rescue misassigned somatic genotypes.

Conclusions

Our work reveals extensive polyclonality that undermines standard precision genotyping in de novo mCSPC, nominates practical strategies for improved biomarker profiling and genomics-informed risk stratification, and offers deep biological insight into the relationship between primary and untreated metastases.

Clinical trial identification

Presenting data collected during the LoMP1/2 clinical trials: NCT02138721 and NCT03655886, respectively.

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research.

Disclosure

E. Kwan: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Advisory board, Sponsor/funding (Travel, Accommodations, Expenses), Honoraria, Research grant (institutional): Astellas Pharma; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Advisory board, Honoraria: Janssen; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Advisory board, sponsor/funding (Travel, Accommodations, Expenses), Honoraria: Ipsen; Financial Interests, Personal, Sponsor/Funding, Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Pfizer, Roche; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Honoraria: Research Review; Financial Interests, Personal, Research Grant: AstraZeneca. M. Annala: Financial Interests, Personal, Ownership Interest: Fluivia. A.W. Wyatt: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca, Astellas, Janssen, Merck; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: ESSA Pharma. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.