Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

292P - Using liquid biopsy in early lung cancer diagnosis: A systematic review of health economic analyses and budget impact analysis for the UK NHS

Date

28 Mar 2025

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Ee Phui Kew

Citation

Journal of Thoracic Oncology (2025) 20 (3): S163-S180. 10.1016/S1556-0864(25)00632-X

Authors

E.P. Kew1, L. Morrell2, S. Wordsworth2, A. Schuh2, P. Patel3, S. Fraser4, J. Pilling4, L. Ashrafian4

Author affiliations

  • 1 Guys and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London/GB
  • 2 University of Oxford, Oxford/GB
  • 3 Royal Brompton Hospital, London/GB
  • 4 Guys and St Thomas NHS Trust, London/GB

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 292P

Background

A national targeted lung screening programme was introduced in the United Kingdom (UK) in 2023. Alongside with the increased use of chest imaging in routine practice, an increased finding of lung nodules is to be expected. Adding liquid biopsy (LB) to the diagnostic pathway can potentially reduce invasive investigations and lead to faster diagnosis. The objectives were to investigate the cost-effectiveness of using LB in lung cancer diagnosis through systematic review, and to investigate its financial consequences to the UK National Health Service (NHS) by performing a budget impact analysis with hypothetical models.

Methods

A systematic literature search was conducted on different databases and screened against the pre-determined eligibility criteria. Qualitative analysis was used to combine all the findings of the eligible studies. Three budget impact models and two hypothetical LB diagnostic pathways were built for the budget impact analysis, using the data from the systematic review studies.

Results

Three eligible studies demonstrated that integrating LB into the lung cancer diagnostic pathway is cost-effective. The budget impact models showed that using LB with high positive predictive value (PPV) but low negative predictive value (NPV) costs more than the current diagnostic pathway, but it could lead to quicker diagnosis and treatment. Using liquid biopsy with high NPV but low PPV could lead to cost-saving. Summary of the costs of each scenario and their budget impact compared to the current diagnostic pathway (CDP).

Table 292P
Costs over 3 yearsBudget Impact Compared to CDP
CDP without LB£1,169,324,669
LungLB liquid biopsy by Schneider et al. (high PPV, low NPV) Hypothetical biomarker by£3,497,666,271 £1,404,912,319£2,328,341,602 £235,587,650
Toumazis et al (high PPV, low NPV)
Micro-RNA signature classifier by Zhao et al. (high NPV, low PPV)£786,650,900−£382,673,769

Conclusions

Using LB in the lung cancer diagnostic pathway is cost-effective. These novel LB diagnostic pathways could lead to either earlier diagnosis or cost-saving to the UK NHS. Our budget impact models could be helpful to other healthcare systems as they can input their own population and costs data into the models. It could also be used in the early economic assessments of other precision cancer medicine approaches.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.