Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

231P - Prognostic factors for survival in unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving chemoradiotherapy (CRT)

Date

28 Mar 2025

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Jikai Zhou

Citation

Journal of Thoracic Oncology (2025) 20 (3): S123-S150. 10.1016/S1556-0864(25)00632-X

Authors

J. Zhou1, F. Tohidinezhad2, Y. Huang2, D. De Ruysscher2, L. Hendriks3, P. Kalendralis2, A. Lobo Gomes2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Univerity of Maastricht, Maastricht/NL
  • 2 GROW Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht/NL
  • 3 Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC), Maastricht/NL

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 231P

Background

Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths. For unresectable stage III NSCLC, standard treatment includes concurrent or sequential CRT with optional adjuvant immunotherapy. Prognostic outcomes vary widely, making accurate prediction of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) essential for personalized treatment. This study aims to develop a prognostic model combining clinical factors with radiomic features from lung and tumor regions to improve prediction accuracy.

Methods

This study analyzed 213 stage III NSCLC patients treated at Maastro Clinic (Netherlands) from 2015 to 2022, divided into training (70%) and validation (30%) sets. Clinical predictors of PFS and OS were identified using univariate and multivariate Cox models, forming a clinical prediction model (Model-C). Performance was assessed using the concordance index (C-index). Kaplan-Meier curves evaluated the impact of adjuvant durvalumab.

Results

For PFS, univariate Cox analysis identified advanced age at initial treatment, PS score (2–3), hypertension, and chronic kidney disease as risk factors, while adjuvant durvalumab and concurrent CRT were protective. Multivariate analysis confirmed PS score (HR=2.00, 95% CI: 1.19–3.37, p=0.01) and adjuvant durvalumab (HR=0.47, 95% CI: 0.25–0.89, p=0.02) as significant. Model-C achieved a C-index of 0.7118 (training) and 0.6950 (validation). For OS, univariate analysis identified similar factors. Multivariate analysis revealed PS score (HR=2.50, 95% CI: 1.36–4.59) and adjuvant durvalumab (HR=0.32, 95% CI: 0.13–0.78) as significant, with a C-index of 0.7286 (training) and 0.7369 (validation). Kaplan-Meier curves showed significant differences in OS and PFS based on adjuvant durvalumab (Log-Rank Test p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Adjuvant durvalumab significantly improves PFS and OS. Concurrent CRT offers better outcomes than sequential CRT. Patients with higher PS scores are at greater risk, emphasizing the need for tailored treatment strategies. Future work will integrate radiomic features selected using SHAP values to develop tumor (Model-TC), lung (Model-LC), and combined radiomics models (Model-LTC) to enhance predictive accuracy.

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.