Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

338P - Preoperative immunochemotherapy versus chemotherapy for patients with stage I-IIIB small-cell lung cancer

Date

28 Mar 2025

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Jiacong Liu

Citation

Journal of Thoracic Oncology (2025) 20 (3): S181-S207. 10.1016/S1556-0864(25)00632-X

Authors

J. Liu1, L. Zhu1, X. Huang1, J. Hu2

Author affiliations

  • 1 The First Affiliated Hospital of Medical School of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou/CN
  • 2 The First Affiliated Hospital of Medical School of Zhejiang University, 310003 - Hangzhou/CN

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 338P

Background

To date, there remains a paucity of comparative investigations about preoperative immunochemotherapy and conventional chemotherapy in the context of limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) patients. This study conducted a comprehensive comparative assessment concerning the safety and efficacy profiles of preoperative immunochemotherapy and chemotherapy in individuals diagnosed with stage I–IIIB SCLC.

Methods

This investigation collected 53 consecutive patients diagnosed with LS-SCLC spanning stage I to IIIB who underwent preoperative immunochemotherapy or conventional chemotherapy at our hospital from January 2019 to July 2021. Patients were allocated to receive 2–4 cycles of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy or chemotherapy, with each cycle lasting three weeks. Comprehensive analyses encompassed baseline characteristics, clinical staging, tumor response, intraoperative and postoperative outcomes, and the assessment of treatment-related adverse events (trAEs). The follow-up period is extended for a minimum of one year after surgery.

Results

The objective response rate of the immunochemotherapy group was higher (89.5%) than that of the chemotherapy group(75.0%, P=0.206). The surgical resection rate of the immunochemotherapy group was 48.3% (14/29), which was higher than the chemotherapy group (20.8%, 5/24). After neoadjuvant treatment, there were more patients in stage 0 in the immunochemotherapy group andwe could find significant difference between these two groups (P=0.009). The rates of major pathological response (MPR) and pathological complete remission (pCR) in the immunochemotherapy group were 57.1% and 7.1%, respectively, which were both higher than the chemotherapy group (MPR: 40.0%, pCR: 0.0%), but there was no significant difference (P=0.073). The median DFS for both groups were not reached. The mean DFS was 39.8 months for the immunochemotherapy group versus 28.8 months for the chemotherapy group (P=0.43). There was no significant difference in the incidence of grade 3–4 toxicities between the immunochemotherapy group and the chemotherapy group.

Conclusions

For patients with stage I–IIIB SCLC, neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy as first-line therapy is feasible and safe.

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.