Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

41P - Network meta-analysis (NMA) of the first-line therapy for advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (nsNSCLC): Does PD-L1 expression modify effect of the immunotherapy on the overall survival (OS)?

Date

28 Mar 2025

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Mikhail Fedyanin

Citation

Journal of Thoracic Oncology (2025) 20 (3): S1-S97. 10.1016/S1556-0864(25)00632-X

Authors

M. Fedyanin1, O. Mironenko2, N. Sableva2, A. Lazarev3, D. Tolkacheva2, K.V. Sapozhnikov4

Author affiliations

  • 1 National Medical Research Center of Oncology named after N.N. Blokhin, Moscow/RU
  • 2 The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Moscow/RU
  • 3 The Bonch-Bruevich St Petersburg State University of Telecommunications, St. Petersburg/RU
  • 4 S.M. Kirov MMA - Military Medical Academy, St. Petersburg/RU

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 41P

Background

The efficacy of PD-1 inhibitors in pts with NSCLC may be related to the proportion of pts with negative (< 1%TPS/TPC) or high (≥ 50% TPS/TPC) PD-L1 expression. Studies included into NMA were quite heterogenous in proportion of PD-L1-negative patients and hyperexpressors. Systematic reviewand Bayesian individual patient data NMA (PROSPERO ID CRD42024521004) were conducted to assess modifying effect of PD-L1 expression on OS in pts with advanced nsNSCLC between chemotherapy (CT), immunotherapy (PD-1 inhibitors ± CTLA-4 inhibitors), targeted therapy and their combinations.

Methods

We assessed clinical heterogeneity and the risk of bias for studies included into NMA. Multilevel network meta-regression (ML NMR) with an interaction between treatment class and proportion of PDL1-negative pts was estimated.

Results

All studies in NMA were randomized with a low risk of bias in this domain (except for the Checkmate 227 study with an undetermined risk), in ML NMR randomization was respected by stratifying the baseline hazard by study. Hazard ratio for treatment effect modification by PD-L1 negative status is 0.92 (95% CrI, 0.51, 1.66), treatment rankings by OS are almost insensitive to the share of PD-L1-negative pts, and Prolgolimab+CT and Nivolumab+Bevacizumab+CT are the best options with the same OS profile for both PD-L1-negative and PD-L1-positive ones.

Conclusions

PD-L1 expression does not modify the effect of immunotherapy over CT ± Bevacizumab on the OS. Prologlimab+CT and Nivolumab+Bevacizumab+CT have benefit in the OS over all other treatment options irrespective to the proportion of pts with positive PD-1 expression.

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.