Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

368P - Molecular diagnosis of lung cancer via ctDNA and ctRNA detection on bronchoscopic fluid: A bicenter prospective study (BiLiBro)

Date

28 Mar 2025

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Gabrielle Danino

Citation

Journal of Thoracic Oncology (2025) 20 (3): S208-S232. 10.1016/S1556-0864(25)00632-X

Authors

G. Danino1, A. Perrier2, J. Camuset3, V. Trosini-Desert2, C. Mahiat3, M. Teulier2, J. Slomka3, Y. Bouznad2, A. Canellas3, C. Meteye3, P. Wang3, J. Calvani2, F. Coulet2, E. Guillerm2, J. Cadranel4, V. Fallet3

Author affiliations

  • 1 Hopital Tenon AP-HP, Paris/FR
  • 2 Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne Université, Paris/FR
  • 3 Tenon Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris and GRC 4, Theranoscan, Sorbonne Université, Paris/FR
  • 4 Hôpital Tenon and GRC04 Theranoscan Sorbonne Université, Paris/FR

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 368P

Background

Plasma ctDNA enables targeted therapy prescription in metastatic lung cancer by identifying oncogenic drivers and is now applied to fluids like pleural fluid or CSF. This study assessed ctDNA and ctRNA accuracy in bronchoscopic fluid for detecting oncogenic mutations.

Methods

We conducted a bicenter prospective study involving patients undergoing bronchoscopy for lung cancer diagnosis or follow-up. Next-generation sequencing (ThermoFisher®) targeted 59 genes for DNA and 23 for RNA in proven NSCLC. Molecular diagnostic accuracy of bronchoscopic fluid was evaluated with histological samples as reference standard.

Results

Between February and May 2024, 78 patients were screened in two French University hospitals, and 54 with confirmed NSCLC were included. Bronchoscopy was performed for NSCLC diagnostic in 94.5% of cases. Median age was 67 years; 72.2%were smokers, 77.8% had non-squamous lung cancer, and 50% were stage IV. Molecular abnormalities were detected in 96% of cases, including KRAS (n=13), EGFR (n=10), BRAF (n=4), and ALK rearrangements (n=3). A bronchus sign on CT was present in 75.9% of cases, and 46.3% of bronchoscopies revealed endobronchial abnormalities. Bronchial histological diagnosis was achieved in 72% of bronchoscopies with abnormalities and in 3.4% in macroscopically normal bronchoscopies. All but one ctDNA analyses on bronchoscopic fluid succeeded, but 44.4% of ctRNA analyses failed due to technical issues. Compared with tissue molecular analysis, ctDNA sensitivity in bronchoscopic fluid was 81.3%, with a specificity of 100%. In bronchoscopies with negative histology results, sensitivity was 70%. In case of macroscopically abnormal and normal bronchoscopies, sensitivity was 91.7% and 70.8%, respectively. Plasma ctDNA sensitivity was 30% across all stages. Subgroup analyses showed higher ctDNA sensitivity in bronchoscopic fluid in tumors >4 cm (92.8% vs 65%; p=0.024), bronchus sign presence (89% vs. 54%; p=0.020), and stage IV disease (96% vs 62.2%; p=0.006).

Conclusions

Liquid biopsy via bronchoscopy is a promising, minimally invasive tool for molecular diagnostics in NSCLC, offering high sensitivity and specificity, particularly in advanced disease and with a bronchus sign.

Clinical trial identification

BiLiBro; NCT06228508

Legal entity responsible for the study

Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris

Funding

ACTT - Amis du Centre des Tumeurs de Tenon

Disclosure

C. Mahiat: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: MSD. A. Canellas: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Pfizer; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: AstraZeneca, Takeda, Amgen. J. Cadranel: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo Inc, F. Hoffman La Roche, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Takeda. V. Fallet: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca, BMS, Takeda, Roche, Pfizer, Sanofi, Sandoz, Jansen, Regeneron, MSD, Amgen; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: AstraZeneca, BMS, Takeda, Pfizer, MSD, Sanofi, ISIS Medical; Financial Interests, Personal, Expert Testimony: GSK, Boehringer Ingelheim. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.