Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

204P - Localised non-small cell lung cancer: Patient characteristics and radical radiotherapy outcomes according to KRAS mutation status

Date

28 Mar 2025

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Ana Sofia Parreira

Citation

Journal of Thoracic Oncology (2025) 20 (3): S123-S150. 10.1016/S1556-0864(25)00632-X

Authors

A.S.D.F.M. Parreira1, K.D.D. Brown2, M. Carter1, H. Adderley1, F. Monaca1, C. Lindsay1, C. Faivre-Finn1

Author affiliations

  • 1 The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester/GB
  • 2 The University of Manchester, Manchester/GB

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 204P

Background

Molecular-guided treatments are increasingly shaping the management of localised non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), emphasising the need to better understand the characteristics and outcome impact of KRAS mutations in this context.

Methods

This is an update of a retrospective, real-world, single-centre study analysing stage 1–3 NSCLC patients (pts) treated with radical radiotherapy (RRT) (≥40 Gy, ≥15 fractions) between 07/21 and 04/24. Pts with a known KRAS mutation (mt) or next generation sequencing analysis and no other drivers were included. Baseline characteristics, and relapse-free survival (RFS) were compared between KRAS mt and wildtype (wt) pts.

Results

202 NSCLC pts were included: 102 KRAS wt, 100 KRAS mt. The median follow-up was 23 months (m). The KRAS mt group had significantly more women and higher median PD-L1 levels (31% vs 22%, p < 0.001; 39% vs 0%, p=0.0001; respectively). Non-adenocar-cinoma histology was more frequent in the wt group (29% vs 8%, p < 0.001). On Cox univariate analysis, these variables did not show a significant impact on RFS outcomes. The table shows treatment and molecular characteristics. The median RFS for all stages was 14 m for KRAS mt and 12 m for wt (p=0.107). Among stage 3 pts, the median RFS for KRAS mt and wt were: not reached (NR)/16 m for concurrent (CCRT); 11/10 m for sequential chemoradiotherapy (SCRT) and 10/12 m for radiotherapy (RT) alone, respectively. A higher proportion of KRAS mt pts received maintenance durvalumab (32.4% vs 15.7% wt). When pts treated with durvalumab were excluded, CCRT outcomes were similar between groups (11 vs 12 m for wt). Codon Q61 pts showed better RFS (NR vs 19 m for G12 and 8 m for G13).

Table 204P
Stage I-II (n=51)Stage IIIA-C (n=138)
KRAS wt (n=102)

Total (n,%)

Treatment (n,%)

25 (49%)

23 (92%) primary RT alone

2 (8%) Adjuvant/after surgery

70 (51%)

31 (44%s) RT alone

22 (31%) CCRT

17 (24%) SCRT

KRAS mt (n=100)

Total (n,%)

Treatment (n,%)

26 (51%)

25 (96%) primary RT alone

1 (4%) adjuvant/after surgery

68 (49%)

22 (32%) primary RT alone

2 (3%) adjuvant/after surgery

31 (46%) CCRT

13 (19%) SCRT

Subtype (n,%)Codon 12G12C: 17Codon 12 (60, 88%)G12C: 35 (51%)
(23, 68%)(68%)
G12V: 2 (8%)G12V: 12 (18%)
G12D:3G12D: 8 (12%)
(12%)
G12A: 0G12A: 2 (3%)
Other G12:Other: 2 (3%)
1 (4%)
Codon G130Codon 135 (7%)
Codon Q612 (8%)Codon 614 (6%)

Conclusions

Stage 3 KRAS mt pts might derive greater benefit from CCRT followed by durvalumab than KRAS wt. RT alone or SCRT show similar outcome regardless of KRAS status. KRAS codons might impact differently on RT outcomes. These findings are limited by the small sample size and should be interpreted cautiously.

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

C. Lindsay: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker, Advisory role: Amgen; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker, Educational Presentation/Workshop: Amgen; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Qiagen; Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker, CI for a phase III clinical trial: Mirati Therapeutics, Amgen; Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker, CI for a phase I-II clinical trial: BI, Revolution Medicines; Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker, CI for a phase II clinical trial: Roche; Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker, PI for a phase II clinical trial: Apollomics; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant, Research funding which includes use of their medical products: Revolution Medicines; Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel funding for poster presentation: Boehringer Ingelheim; Other, Personal, Other, Review paper coordinated by Amgen. Initially drafted by other writers, with contributions from co-authors.: Amgen. C. Faivre-Finn: Financial Interests, Institutional, Other, research-related advisory, steering committee, lectures: AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Institutional, Other, research-related projects, advisory: Elekta; Financial Interests, Institutional, Other, Research-related funding: MSD. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.