Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

142P - Identification of the lymph node metastasis atlas and optimal lymph node dissection strategy in patients with resectable lung invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma: A real-world multicentre study

Date

28 Mar 2025

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Jie He

Citation

Journal of Thoracic Oncology (2025) 20 (3): S98-S120. 10.1016/S1556-0864(25)00632-X

Authors

J. He1, J. Li2, G. Zhang2, C. Zheng2, J. Jia2, S. Xu3, W. Zhao3, Y. Liu4, M. Yue5, Y. Liu5, S. Zhang6, Y. Shen7, Y. Han8, J. Li8, H. Yan9, L. Xue2, Y. Gao2, F. Tan2, S. Gao2, Q. Xue2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences - National Cancer Center, Cancer Hospital, Beijing/CN
  • 2 Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College - National Cancer Center, Cancer Hospital, Beijing/CN
  • 3 The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang/CN
  • 4 Guangxi Medical University Affiliated Tumour Hospital, Nanning/CN
  • 5 The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang/CN
  • 6 Shanxi Provincial Cancer Hospital, Taiyuan/CN
  • 7 Jinling Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University School of Medicine/Eastern Theater General Hospital of PLA, Nanjing/CN
  • 8 General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan/CN
  • 9 The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang/CN

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract 142P

Background

Lung invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma (LIMA) is a rare and heterogeneous subtype of lung cancer, with patterns of lymph node metastasis unknown and consensus on LND strategy unreached. This study aimed to evaluate lymph node metastasis patterns in LIMAs and establish optimal lymph node dissection (LND) strategies.

Methods

Data from 19,596 lymph nodes from 1,474 LIMA patients were analysed. Metastasis probabilities were calculated for each lymph node station to construct a metastasis atlas. Statistical methods, including LOWESS fitting, restricted cubic spline, Kaplan-Meier, and Cox regression analyses, were employed to identify optimal LND strategies.

Results

Compared with nonmucinous adenocarcinoma patients, LIMAs had larger tumor sizes and a significant increase in the number of dissected lymph nodes. However, the probability of lymph node metastasis in patients with LIMA was significantly lower than that in nonmucinous adenocarcinoma (4.20% vs. 7.19%, p < 0.05), suggesting distinct patterns of lymph node metastasis. Metastasis was most common in the peripheral and upper zones (stations 3P and 14), with minimal involvement in the lower zone (stations 8 and 9). This pattern was also confirmed in 208 patients with N1/2 stage. A predictive model (AUC=0.837) identified a high-risk group with a significantly greater proportion of patients with stage N1+ disease (68.09% vs. 11.63%, p < 0.001) and aworse prognosis (HR=4.02, 95% CI:2.74–5.90, p < 0.001). Dissecting over 18 lymph nodes did not further improve the accuracy of N staging. A U-shaped relationship between the lymph node count and prognosis was found, with 6–25 lymph nodes as the optimal range. Excessive or insufficient dissection was closely related to poorer outcomes.

Conclusions

This study is the first to systematically reveal the LIMAspecific lymph node metastasis pattern and recommend LND strategies. We recommend using 18 lymph nodes as the optimal cut-off point for N staging, while dissection of 6 to 25 lymph nodes is crucial for tumor control and long-term prognosis. Appropriate adjustments can be made based on the metastasis atlas and predictive model in actual clinical practice.

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2022YFC2407404); Beijing Natural Science Foundation (7232134); CAMS Initiative for Innovative Medicine (2021-1-I2M-012); National High-Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding (2022-PUMCH-C-043); Beijing Hope Run Special Fund of Cancer Foundation of China (LC2021L01, LC2021B12); Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission (Z211100002921058); Administrative Research Fund, CHCAMS (LC2021D01).

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.