Abstract 232P
Background
Lower SES negatively affects cancer outcomes, but comprehensive analyses in Brazil are scarce. This study evaluates the impact of SES on stage at diagnosis and survival in lung adenocarcinoma.
Methods
A cohort of 17,771 pathology-confirmed lung adenocarcinoma cases in patients aged ≥18 years (2000–20) from Fundaça?o Oncocentro de Sa?o Paulo’s database was analyzed. Patient, treatment, and disease characteristics were summarized as medians with interquartile ranges (IQR). Trends in demographics, treatment, and diagnosis-to-treatment intervals were assessed. Survival was estimated by KM analysis.
Results
Median age at diagnosis was 63 years (IQR 20–96), with females comprising 45% of cases. Most diagnoses occurred at advanced stages (III/IV), with stage IV accounting for 62%, followed by stages III (20%), I (12%), and II (5%). Median diagnosis-to-treatment time was 35 days (IQR 11–69), with 30% of patients waiting >60 days for treatment initiation. Stage at diagnosis strongly correlated with survival (p < 0.0001): stage I, 2.8 years (IQR 1.1–5.8); stage II, 2.0 years (IQR 0.7–4.2); stage III, 1.03 years (IQR 0.4–2.2); and stage IV, 0.55 years (IQR 0.2–1.3). Higher GDP and education were linked to earlier diagnoses and improved 5-year survival (p < 0.001). University-educated patients experienced faster treatment initiation and better survival (p < 0.01). Stage I diagnoses were more common among university-educated patients than those with no schooling (20.6% vs. 9.3%, p < 0.001). Female representation and immunotherapy use rose over time (p < 0.001), while treatment delays grew from 20 days (IQR 3–40) in 2000 to 54 days (IQR 24–92) in 2015 (p=0.02). Incident cases rose by ∼29% every four years. Finally, median survival improved over time.
Table 232PGender, treatment and survival temporal trends for lung adenocarcinoma
2000–04 (N=2,899) | 2005–09 (N=3,530) | 2010–14 (N=5,244) | 2015–20 (N=6,118) | p | |
Male (%) | 63.2 | 57.8 | 53.5 | 50.7 | |
Female (%) | 36.8 | 42.2 | 46.5 | 49.3 | |
Chemo (%) | 60.0 | 65.0 | 62.0 | 56.0 | |
Radiation (%) | 36.0 | 36.0 | 36.0 | 33.0 | ConclusionsSES greatly affects lung adenocarcinoma outcomes in Brazil. Higher GDP and education correlate with earlier diagnoses and better survival, but increasing delays and rising cases strain healthcare infrastructure. Legal entity responsible for the studyDivision of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Sinclair Research Institute. FundingHas not received any funding. DisclosureAll authors have declared no conflicts of interest. This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used. For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.
|