Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

55P - Clinical value and optimal timing of cranial stereotactic radiotherapy for third-generation EGFR-TKI-treated NSCLC with baseline limited brain metastases

Date

28 Mar 2025

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

ZHENGFEI ZHU

Citation

Journal of Thoracic Oncology (2025) 20 (3): S1-S97. 10.1016/S1556-0864(25)00632-X

Authors

S. Yu1, Z. ZHU2, J. Ni3, X. Zhu4, L. Peng5, L. Zhang6, W. Yu7

Author affiliations

  • 1 Fudan University Affiliated Cancer Hospital, Shanghai/CN
  • 2 Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai/CN
  • 3 Cancer Hospital Shanghai Medical University, Shanghai/CN
  • 4 Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai/CN
  • 5 Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology/ Cancer Center Union Hospital, Wuhan/CN
  • 6 Department of Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China., Wuhan/CN
  • 7 Shanghai Chest Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai/CN

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 55P

Background

Our previous studies indicated potential survival benefit of upfront cranial stereotactic radiotherapy (ucSRT) in third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-treated EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with baseline limited brain metastases (BMs). However, the optimal timing and patient selection of ucSRT in this disease population remain controversial.

Methods

Consecutive EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients with baseline limited BMs receiving third-generation EGFR-TKIs alone (TKI alone) or in combination with ucSRT (TKI+ucSRT), were identified from a multicenter prospective database (NCT06613633). ucSRT performed within or after 4 weeks of the initiation of third-generation EGFR-TKIs were classified as concurrent or consolidative SRT, respectively. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and intracranial PFS (iPFS) were extensively compared in propensity score matched (PSM) patient subgroups.

Results

Among the 400 patients included, 266 (66.5%), 82 (20.5%), and 52 (13.0%) were in the TKI alone, concurrent SRT and consolidative SRT group, respectively. Compared to those in the TKI alone group, concurrent and consolidative SRT were associated with improved iPFS and PFS, the latter of which was also associated with prolonged OS [31.1 vs not reached (NR) months, P=0.0026]. Moreover, patients in the TKI alone group were further divided into two subgroups, with (n=71) or without (n=189) intracranial complete response (iCR). Compared to those in the iCR subgroup, neither concurrent SRT nor consolidative SRT was associated with improved OS. Nevertheless, compared to those in the non-iCR subgroup, consolidative SRT, but not concurrent SRT, was associated with prolonged OS.

Conclusions

Upfront cranial SRT, especially consolidative SRT, was associated with improved prognosis in third-generation EGFR-TKItreated NSCLC patients with baseline limited BMs. Those without intracranial complete response from EGFR-TKI monotherapy seemed to derive the most survival benefit from cranial SRT. Future validations are warranted.

Legal entity responsible for the study

Z. Zhu.

Funding

Key Clinical Specialty Project of Shanghai; National Science Foundation of China (No. 82172825).

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.

  • Analytics cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage.

  • We use marketing cookies to build a profile of you as a user through your actions on our site in order to better understand your interests and provide you with pertinent suggestions.