Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

193P - Association of Effective Dose to Immune Cells with Outcomes after Definitive Chemoradiotherapy and Durvalumab in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Multi-Center Study

Date

28 Mar 2025

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Ari Raphael

Citation

Journal of Thoracic Oncology (2025) 20 (3): S123-S150. 10.1016/S1556-0864(25)00632-X

Authors

A. Raphael1, O. Icht1, P. Blumenfeld2, S. Appel3, A. Allen4, M.T. Moskovitz1, D.J. Reinhorn1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Davidoff Cancer Center - Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva/IL
  • 2 Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem/IL
  • 3 Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan/IL
  • 4 Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem/IL

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 193P

Background

The Effective Dose to Immune Cells (EDIRC) is a dosimetry-based metric that estimates radiation exposure to circulating immune cells during radiotherapy. Elevated EDIRC is linked to lymphopenia, immune dysfunction, and poor tumor control in unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after chemoradiation (CRT). However, it is unclear if EDIRC directly correlates with clinical outcomes and particularly with durvalumab consolidation, or if confounding factors drive this association. This study examined whether EDIRC independently correlates with progression free survival (PFS).

Methods

Data from unresectable NSCLC patients treated with CRT and durvalumab between 2017–2023 at three tertiary centers were analyzed. Maximally selected rank statistic determined the optimal EDIRC cutoff, and multivariable analysis evaluated its correlation with PFS.

Results

A total of 239 NSCLC patients were categorized into low and high EDIRC groups. For the entire cohort, the median PFS was 22.4 months. The EDIRC cutoffs was 8.5. Patients in the low EDIRC group demonstrated significantly longer PFS compared to those in the high EDIRC group (27.8 months vs. 10.6 months, HR=0.48, p < 0.0001). Subgroup analysis by PD-L1 status showed this difference remained statistically significant in the PD-L1 positive cohort (HR=0.41, p=0.005) but not in the PD-L1 negative cohort (HR=0.57, p=0.2). In a multivariable analysis accounting for EDIRC, stage, GTV and PDL-1 status, only EDIRC (HR=0.49, p=0.043) and stage (HR=0.5, p=0.04) remained an independent prognostic factor for PFS.

Conclusions

Lower EDIRC level independently correlates with longer PFS after CRT and durvalumab.

Legal entity responsible for the study

Rabin Medical Center.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

S. Appel: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: MSD. M.T. Moskovitz: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant, and Honoria: AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting fees: Amgen, Bayer; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker, Also: Consulting fees and participation on safety monitoring or advisory bords: MSD; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker, Also: Consulting fees,: Takeda; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker, and support of travel: Roche, Pfizer. D.J. Reinhorn: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: MSD, Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.