Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

394P - Advancing lung cancer chemotherapy via single-lung perfusion and blood flow occlusion

Date

28 Mar 2025

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Erik Claes

Citation

Journal of Thoracic Oncology (2025) 20 (3): S208-S232. 10.1016/S1556-0864(25)00632-X

Authors

E. Claes1, S. Verleden2, T. Lapperre2, D. Peeters3, J. De Raedemaecker2, A. Neyrinck4, A. Alves5, J. van Daele5, P. Annaert5, J. Hendriks2

Author affiliations

  • 1 University of Antwerp, Antwerpen/BE
  • 2 University of Antwerp, Wilrijk/BE
  • 3 UZA - University Hospital Antwerp, Wilrijk/BE
  • 4 KU Leuven, Leuven/BE
  • 5 BioNotus CommV, Niel/BE

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 394P

Background

The maximum tolerated dose of intravenous (IV) chemotherapy for lung cancer is often limited by systemic toxicities. Selective Pulmonary Artery Perfusion (SPAP) combined with Blood Flow Occlusion (BFO) may increase local drug levels in cell DNA while minimizing systemic exposure. The drug is delivered via a balloon catheter in the pulmonary artery, with blood flowreduced or occluded to prevent washout. Unlike isolated lung perfusion, SPAP-BFO is minimally invasive, allowing for repeated administration. This study compares the pharmacokinetics of gemcitabine (GCB) and its metabolites following SPAP-BFO and IV administration, while evaluating safety.

Methods

Four groups (n=5pigs/group) were treated with GCB (1.25 g/m2): IV for 30 minutes; 10 minutes SPAP without BFO (SPAP-BFO 0%); 10 minutes SPAP-BFO 50% (SPAP-BFO 50%); 10 seconds SPAP followed by complete BFO for 9 minutes and 50 seconds (SPAP-BFO 100%). Concentrations of GCB (dFdC) and metabolites (inactive dFdU, active dFdCTP) were analyzed in plasma and after 30 minutes in lung tissue.

Results

SPAP-BFO is safe, with no physiological effects or acute lung damage. Systemic dFdC exposure increased significantly in both the BFO 0% (vs. IV, p < 0.001; vs. BFO 100%, p < 0.001) and BFO 50% (vs. IV, p < 0.010; vs. BFO 100%, p < 0.010) groups. In the lung, SPAP-BFO 100% exhibited significantly higher dFdCTP exposure than controls (p < 0.010) and BFO 0% (p < 0.050). DNA-bound dFdCTP levels were 4.15 μg/g (BFO 100%) and 4.77 μg/g (BFO 50%), both exceeding the 2.40 μg/g for IV.

Table 394P
GroupsAUC dFdC plasmaAUC dFdCTP lungConc. dFdCTP lung (μg/g)
lV1S04 (1369–1914)6.S (6.S-8.2)2.40 (1.47-S.72)
SPAP-BFO 0%272S (2468-S124)a,c6.S (6.S-9.2)2.69 (1.81-S.80)
SPAP-BFO(2146–2840)a,c11.0 (6.70–11.9)4.1S (2.46-S.48)a
S0%
SPAP-BFO1478 (1411–1810)S6.4 (21.8–4S.4)a,b4.77 (S.21–7.74)a,b
100%

ap < 0.05 compared to IV

bp < 0.05 compared to SPAP-BFO 0%

cp < 0.05 compared to SPAP-BFO 100%. Values are median (IQR).

Conclusions

This study shows the potential of SPAP-BFO with GCB as therapy for lung cancer, with increased dFdCTP levels in lung tissue for BFO 50% and BFO 100%. Notably, only BFO 100% also reduced systemic exposure, making it the most viable candidate for phase I clinical trials.

Funding

Kom op tegen Kanker (Stand up to Cancer), the Flemish Cancer Society

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.