Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

127P - Waning effect of adjuvant EGFR TKIs in resected EGFR-mutated (EGFR-m) NSCLC: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs)

Date

22 Mar 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Topics

Tumour Site

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Presenters

Martina Imbimbo

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 9 (suppl_3): 1-10. 10.1016/esmoop/esmoop102570

Authors

M. Imbimbo1, M. Occhipinti2, V. Simeon3, N. Skoetz4, G. Fiscon5, C. Marchal6, G. Viscardi7, R. Ferrara8

Author affiliations

  • 1 CHUV - Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne/CH
  • 2 Fondazione IRCCS - Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan/IT
  • 3 Universita degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Napoli/IT
  • 4 University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne/DE
  • 5 Sapienza Università di Roma, Rome/IT
  • 6 Université de Franche-Comté, Besancon/FR
  • 7 Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Napoli/IT
  • 8 UniSR - Università Vita e Salute San Raffaele Milano, Milan/IT

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 127P

Background

Osimertinib has been approved as adjuvant (adj) therapy in resected EGFR-m non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) based on results of the ADAURA trial. Despite the improvement in both disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), it is still unclear if adj TKI result in a delay of recurrence rather than cure.

Methods

RCTs comparing TKI versus (vs) placebo (PBO) or platinum-based chemotherapy (CT) as adj treatments in patients (pts) with resected EGFR-m NSCLC were searched in PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane until 12/2023. Drug-on and drug-off time: defined as time of administration and first year (yr) from the planned end of TKI, respectively. RCTs providing both hazard-ratio (HR) for DFS and/or OS and number of pts free of relapse/death within the drug-on and drug-off time were eligible. Primary endpoints: DFS and OS in TKI both vs PBO and vs CT, reported as HR. Secondary endpoint: risk of relapse/death within the drug-on and drug-off time, estimated by RR.

Results

8 RCTs (n=2352) were included. Treatment with TKI improved both OS (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.38-0.76, P = 0.0005) and DFS (HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.27-0.40, P < 0.00001) vs PBO. DFS was significantly improved with TKI vs CT (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.35-0.83, P = 0.005) while there was no effect on OS (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.52-1.18, P = 0.25). Both for TKI vs PBO (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.20-0.85, P = 0.01) and TKI vs CT (RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.51-0.84, P = 0.001) the risk of relapse/death favored TKI during drug-on time. However, during the drug off time the risk of relapse/death within the TKI drug-off time did not differ with TKI compared to PBO (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.82-1.47, P = 0.54) or to CT (RR 1.24, 95% CI 0.87-1.77, P = 0.24).

Table: 127P

Characteristics of included studies

Trial Exp Contr Duration (yr)
Goss 2013 Gefitinib PBO 2
Kelly 2014 Erlotinib PBO 2
He 2021 Icotinib CT 2
Zhong 2021 Gefitinib CT 2
Tada 2022 Gefitinib CT 2
Yue 2022 Erlotinib CT 2
Ou 2023 Icotinib PBO 1
Tsuboi 2023 Osimertinib PBO 3

Conclusions

In pts with EGFR-m NSCLC, adj TKI significantly improved DFS compared to PBO and CT. Risk of relapse/death was significantly decreased in the drug-on time with TKI, but no longer within the drug-off time suggesting a waning effect due to TKI withdrawal and the need of continuing therapy to get a long-term benefit.

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

M. Imbimbo: Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Principal Investigator: BMS, MedImmune; Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Independent Safety Data Monitoring board member: Immatics. G. Viscardi: Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Training: Sanofi. R. Ferrara: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, In April 2022: MSD; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: BeiGene; Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: MSD, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Roche, Sanofi, Novartis, BMS, Ipsen, Daiichi Sankyo Company. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.