Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

117P - Tumour spread through air spaces is a determiner for treatment of clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer: Thoracoscopic segmentectomy vs lobectomy

Date

22 Mar 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Topics

Tumour Site

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Presenters

Rene Petersen

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 9 (suppl_3): 1-10. 10.1016/esmoop/esmoop102570

Authors

R.H. Petersen, L. Huang

Author affiliations

  • Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen/DK

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 117P

Background

The aim of this study was to analyse the prognostic influence of tumour spread through air spaces (STAS) on thoracoscopic segmentectomy compared with lobectomy for clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

Patients who underwent thoracoscopic segmentectomy or lobectomy for clinical stage I NSCLC from September 2020 through September 2023 at a high-volume thoracic unit. were included. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) between the two procedures were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank test. Cox regression model was used to analyse independent factors for survivals.

Results

STAS was available in 785 patients, including 151 (19.2%) patients with STAS and 634 (80.8%) patients without STAS. The STAS positive group had significantly higher vascular and lymphatic invasion. The median follow-up was 25.1 months (IQR 20.1-31.1). In the group without STAS, there were no survival difference between segmentectomy (n = 87) and lobectomy (n = 547) (3-year RFS: 77.4% vs 82.6%, p = .350; 3-year OS: 87.5% vs 95.3%, p = .190). Whereas worse survival was found in segmentectomy for patients with STAS (n = 16) compared to lobectomy (n = 135) (3-year RFS: 69.8% vs 82.7%, p < .001; 3-year OS: 58.4% vs 89.0%, p < .001). In multivariable analysis, segmentectomy was an independent prognostic factor for RFS in patients with STAS (HR 9.28, 95% CI 7.66 to 18.18), as well as pleural invasion (HR 5.25, 95% CI 1.44 to 19.16). Moreover, segmentectomy (HR 13.55, 95% CI 3.98 to 46.20) and older age (per 5-year increase: HR 1.96, 95% CI 1.11 to 3.48) were independent prognostic factors of OS among patients with STAS.

Conclusions

In this study there was a superior RFS and OS for lobectomy vs. segmentectomy for clinical stage I NSCLC with STAS.

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Rigshospitalet.

Disclosure

R.H. Petersen: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Medtronic, Medela, AstraZeneca and AMBU; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca, MSD, BMS and Roche. L. Huang: Financial Interests, Personal, Funding: Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.