Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

93P - Real-world analysis of first-line maintenance (1LM) immunotherapy (IO) ± pemetrexed for non-squamous (NSQ) advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (a/mNSCLC) lacking targetable mutations, prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic

Date

22 Mar 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Topics

Tumour Site

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Presenters

Anna Minchom

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 9 (suppl_3): 1-53. 10.1016/esmoop/esmoop102569

Authors

A.R. Minchom1, N. Gilding2, V. Tan2, K. Christoforou2, J. Rule2, A. Aziez3, F. Gomes4, A. Januszewski5

Author affiliations

  • 1 ICR - Institute of Cancer Research, London/GB
  • 2 GSK, Brentford/GB
  • 3 GSK, 4070 - Zug/CH
  • 4 The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester/GB
  • 5 St. Bartholomew's Hospital - Barts Health NHS Trust, London/GB

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 93P

Background

Real-world analyses of 1LM IO ± pemetrexed for patients (pts) with NSQ a/mNSCLC, including the relative impact of 1LM pemetrexed in this setting, are lacking. Here we report a retrospective analysis of 1LM treatment patterns and their outcomes in NSQ a/mNSCLC prior to/during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK.

Methods

We obtained retrospective data from the National Disease Registration Service to identify two cohorts of NSQ a/mNSCLC completing ≥4 cycles of first-line (1L) platinum-based chemotherapy+IO+pemetrexed (chemo-IO), diagnosed from 1 March to 31 December 2019 (pre-COVID), or from 1 March to 31 December 2020 (COVID) inclusive. The aims were to summarise baseline characteristics, 1L treatment, overall survival (OS) and time-to-next-treatment or death (TTNTD) in both cohorts, and in a combined cohort of pts receiving 1LM stratified by the presence/absence of 1LM pemetrexed, using Kaplan-Meier methodology.

Results

595 and 516 NSQ a/mNSCLC pts completed ≥4 cycles of chemo-IO in the non-COVID and COVID cohorts, respectively. Median OS and median TTNTD from 1L were numerically shorter for NSQ patients in the COVID vs pre-COVID cohort (Table). In a combined cohort of 1000 pts receiving 1LM, median OS and median TTNTD from 1L were broadly similar with/without pemetrexed in 1LM (Table).

Table: 93P

Efficacy outcomes from initiation of 1L therapy

Overall NSQ cohorts Pre-COVID, N=595 COVID, N=516
Median OS, months (95% CI) 19.5 (17.6–22.2) 15.7 (14.2–18.0)
Median TTNTD, months (95% CI) 14.8 (13.5–16.2) 12.2 (11.0–13.7)
Pre-COVID and COVID combinedNSQ 1LM cohort, N=1000 IO + pemetrexed, n=827 IO, n=173
Median OS, months (95% CI) 19.5 (17.5–21.6) 18.6 (15.6–23.0)
Median TTNTD, months (95% CI) 15.0 (13.7–16.2) 13.2 (11.7–16.3)

Conclusions

Among the selected pts with NSQ a/mNSCLC completing ≥4 cycles of chemo-IO, efficacy outcomes were numerically shorter in the COVID vs pre-COVID era. In assessing impact of 1LM pemetrexed: clinical outcomes in a combined cohort of pts receiving 1LM from the non-COVID and COVID era were broadly similar, regardless of 1LM pemetrexed use.

Legal entity responsible for the study

GSK UK Limited.

Funding

GSK.

Disclosure

A.R. Minchom: Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: GSK; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Grant/Contract:MSD, Astex; Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker’s Bureau: Merck, GSK, Janssen, Chugai, Seagen; Financial Interests, Personal, Sponsor/Funding: Amgen, Janssen; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Janssen, GSK, Takeda, Genmab, Merck, MSD, Faron. N. Gilding, V. Tan, K. Christoforou, J. Rule, A. Aziez: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: GSK. F. Gomes: Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: GSK; Financial Interests, Personal, Research Grant: Pfizer, Gilead; Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker’s Bureau: AstraZeneca, Roche, Servier; Financial Interests, Personal, Sponsor/Funding, Travel sponsorship: AstraZeneca; Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Leadership Role: International Society of Geriatric Oncology. A. Januszewski: Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: GSK; Financial Interests, Personal, Research Grant: Gilead, Roche; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Teaching: AstraZeneca, Johnson and Johnson, Roche, Pfizer, MSD, Bayer; Financial Interests, Personal, Sponsor/Funding, Travel sponsorship: Johnson and Johnson, Roche, MSD; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: BMS, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, MSD; Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Leadership Role, BTOG Steering Committee Member: British Thoracic Oncology Group.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.