Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

85P - NSCLC-Pro ClustAI: A machine learning model to prognostically stratify patients with advanced NSCLC treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

Date

22 Mar 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Topics

Tumour Site

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Presenters

Valeria Cognigni

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 9 (suppl_3): 1-53. 10.1016/esmoop/esmoop102569

Authors

V. Cognigni1, F. pecci2, G. Bruschi1, A. Sbrollini1, F. Paoloni3, T. Galassi4, L. Cantini5, L. Santamaria3, M. Gualtieri3, V. Lunerti3, S. Villani3, F.D. Savino3, E. Ambrosini6, N. Chiodi6, V. Agostinelli4, G. Mentrasti4, L. Burattini1, R. Berardi3

Author affiliations

  • 1 Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona/IT
  • 2 Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston/US
  • 3 Università Politecnica delle Marche, AOU delle Marche, Ancona/IT
  • 4 Università Politecnica delle Marche, AOU delle Marche, 60126 - Ancona/IT
  • 5 Fortrea Inc., Durham, NC, Durham/US
  • 6 Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona/IT

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 85P

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revamped the clinical outcomes of patients (pts) affected by advanced non-oncogene addicted non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The aim of our study is to develop an ensemble clustering algorithm (Clust) integrated with a logistic regression model (Pro) to prognostically stratify NSCLC pts treated with ICIs (NSCLC-Pro ClustAI).

Methods

Data extraction involved, retrospectively, all consecutive pts with advanced NSCLC treated with ICIs at Department of Medical Oncology, Ancona, Italy. Baseline features included clinicopathological variables and comorbidities commonly available in daily clinical practice. An unsupervised clustering analysis was used to identify groups within the dataset that hold prognostic significance. Clust was built by stacking both the K-means algorithm and the Gaussian Mixture Model. Subsequently, Pro was used to predict clusters’ label. The metrics used to evaluate the average performance of Pro on test sets were ACCuracy (ACC) and Area Under the Curve (AUC). The model was developed in Python on-cloud using the Google Colab service.

Results

A total of 89 NSCLC pts with complete data available were included in the final analysis. The two generated clusters were: cluster 1 (n=54) and cluster 2 (n=35) (Table). Considering clinical outcomes, median progression free survival was 9.96 months for cluster 1 and 3.78 months for cluster 2 (p = 0.007), and median overall survival was 14.25 months for cluster 1 and 9.14 months for cluster 2 (p=0.05). The average ACC and AUC across all splits achieved by Pro model for pts classification into clusters were 0.978 and 0.981, respectively. From the feature ranking, it emerged that the one with higher importance was CONUT score.

Table: 85P

Dataset stratification

Cluster 1 (n=54) % Cluster 2 (n=35) % p
Age* 67.0 73.0 <0.001
NLR* 4.9 6.1 0.28
BMI* 24.4 25.4 0.03
Sex
Male 68.5 82.9 0.13
Female 31.5 17.1
ICI
Monotherapy 51.9 100.0 <0.001
Combination 48.1 0.0
Therapy line
1st 83.3 91.4 0.61
≥2 16.7 8.6
Metastatic sites
0-1 50.6 54.3 0.67
≥2 49.4 45.7
ECOG PS
≥2 3.7 2.9 0.83
0-1 96.3 97.1
Smoking
No 20.4 5.7 0.06
Yes 79.6 94.3
Cardiovascular disease
No 83.3 71.4 0.18
Yes 16.7 28.6
Diabetes mellitus
No 87.0 57.1 0.001
Yes 13.0 42.9
Hypertension
No 61.1 14.3 <0.001
Yes 38.9 85.7
Statin use
No 83.3 28.6 <0.001
Yes 16.7 71.4
CONUT score
Low 88.9 22.9 <0.001
High 11.1 77.1
PD-L1
0% 24.1 2.9
1-49% 40.7 2.9 <0.001
≥50% 35.2 94.1

∗Values expressed as median

Conclusions

By using easy to obtain and reproducible clinicopathological features, we demonstrated that NSCLC-Pro ClustAI is a promising and accurate prognostic model for stratifying NSCLC pts receiving ICIs.

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

L. Cantini: Financial Interests, Institutional, Ownership Interest: Fortrea Inc.; Financial Interests, Institutional, Stocks/Shares: Fortrea Inc. R. Berardi: Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Merck, Otsuka, Eli Lilly, Roche. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.