Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

21P - NGS and FISH for MET amplification detection in post EGFR-TKI resistant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients: A prospective, multi-center study in China

Date

22 Mar 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Topics

Tumour Site

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Presenters

Qian Zheng

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 9 (suppl_3): 1-53. 10.1016/esmoop/esmoop102569

Authors

Q. Zheng

Author affiliations

  • SCU - Sichuan University - Huaxi Campus, Chengdu/CN

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 21P

Background

MET amplification is one of acquired resistance mechanism to EGFR-TKIs in EGFRm advanced NSCLC patients(pts). However, comprehensive data using NGS and FISH for detecting MET amplification is limited in Chinese patients.

Methods

Patients progressed after 1st-, 2nd-, or 3rd-generation EGFR-TKIs were enrolled. Tissue biopsy samples were performed for MET amplification detection via both NGS and FISH. Paired plasma samples were also collected for MET amplification detection by NGS. The sensitivity, specificity and agreement were analyzed between NGS and FISH.

Results

116 post EGFR-TKI resistant pts were analyzed. 45(38.8%) pts were male. 34(29.3%) pts were after 1st or 2nd generation EGFR-TKI, 80(69.0%) pts after 3rd generation EGFR-TKI, while 2(1.7%) pts with lack of data on specific EGFR-TKI drug or combined 1st and 3rd EGFR-TKI. MET amplification was detected in 43(37.1%) patients by FISH, including 19(16.4%) with polysomy and 24(20.7%) with focal amplification. The positive rate of MET amplification in post 3rd gen EGFR-TKI and post 1st/2nd gen EGFR-TKI resistant pts was 45.0% (36/80) and 20.6% (7/34), respectively. Using FISH as reference, the sensitivity, specificity and agreement of detecting MET amplification by NGS in tissue were 39.5%(17/43), 98.6% (72/73) and 76.7% (89/116), respectively. For focal MET amplification in tissue, the sensitivity, specificity and agreement were 66.7%(16/24), 98.6% (72/73) and 90.7%(88/97), respectively. For focal MET amplification in plasma, the sensitivity, specificity and agreement were 29.2%(7/24), 94.5%(69/73) and 78.4%(76/97). Results were both shown in the table.

Table: 21P

Performance of NGS in tissue and plasma

NGS testing Sensitivity Specificity Agreement
Tissue Total 39.5% 98.6% 76.7%
Focal amplification 66.7% 98.6% 90.7%
Plasma Total 20.9% 94.5% 67.2%
Focal amplification 29.2% 94.5% 78.4%

Conclusions

NGS is an alternative method for MET focal amplification detection in tissue. While the sensitivity of NGS testing in plasma needs further improvement to maximize identification of pts with potential benefit from dual-targeted therapy.

Legal entity responsible for the study

Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital.

Funding

AstraZeneca.

Disclosure

The author has declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.