Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

99P - The optimal treatment for patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer: Minimally invasive lobectomy or stereotactic ablative radiotherapy?

Date

31 Mar 2023

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Julianne de Ruiter

Citation

Journal of Thoracic Oncology (2023) 18 (4S): S89-S100.
<article-id>elcc_Ch02

Authors

J. de Ruiter1, V. van der Noort2, J. van Diessen2, E.F. Smit2, R. Damhuis3, K. Hartemink4

Author affiliations

  • 1 Amsterdam/NL
  • 2 NKI-AVL - Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam/NL
  • 3 Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, 3511 DT - Utrecht/NL
  • 4 NKI-AVL - Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, 1066 CX - Amsterdam/NL

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 99P

Background

The standard treatment for operable patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a minimally invasive lobectomy (MIL). However, stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is increasingly being used. The ESLUNG study compares the outcome of MIL and SABR in operable patients.

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study with 38 participating centres, patients with clinical stage I NSCLC (TNM7), treated in 2014–2016 with MIL or SABR, were included. Recurrence rates 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS) and lung-cancer-specific mortality (LCSM) were calculated. RFS and OS were compared after adjusting for confounding by propensity score (PS) weighting.

Results

In total, 2183 patients (1211 MIL and 972 SABR) were included. SABR patients were significantly older, had more comorbidities and poorer lung function and performance status. Postoperative nodal upstaging occurred in 12.1% of operated patients. 30-day mortality was 1.0% after MIL and 0.2% after SABR. SABR patients developed significantly more regional recurrences (18.1 versus 14.2%) and/or distant metastases (26.2 versus 20.2%) with a similar local recurrence rate (13.1 versus 12.1%). Unadjusted 5-year RFS and OS were 58.0 versus 25.1% and 70.2 versus 40.3% after MIL and SABR, respectively. 5-year LCSM was 17.4% after MIL and 24.0% after SABR (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.61–0.90). PS-weighted analyses showed – in patients considered operable – better RFS after MIL (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.49–0.99), but no significant difference in OS (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.53–1.21).

Conclusions

In operable patients with stage I NSCLC, MIL leads to fewer regional recurrences and distant metastases than SABR. However, OS did not differ significantly. Future studies should focus on optimization of patient selection for MIL or SABR to further reduce postoperative mortality after MIL and nodal failures after SABR.

Legal entity responsible for the study

K.J. Hartemink.

Funding

Dutch Cancer Society (KWF Kankerbestrijding).

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.