Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

74P - Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) predictors of response to immunotherapy (ICI): LIPI index and immune-related toxicity

Date

31 Mar 2023

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Alba Moratiel Pellitero

Citation

Journal of Thoracic Oncology (2023) 18 (4S): S35-S88.
<article-id>elcc_Ch01

Authors

A. Moratiel Pellitero1, M. Zapata García2, M. Zurera Berjaga3, I. Ruiz Moreno3, A. Goás Gómez3, M. Martí Pi3, A. Romero Monleón3, K. Osorio3, M. Arribas Velasco3, S. Esteras Per3, M. Gascon Ruiz3, A. Sesma Goñi3, E. Quilez Bielsa3, M.D. Isla Casado3

Author affiliations

  • 1 Zaragoza/ES
  • 2 Hospital Clinico Universitario Lozano Blesa, 50009 - Zaragoza/ES
  • 3 Hospital Clinico Universitario Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza/ES

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 74P

Background

ICI is proposed as the standard treatment for metastatic NSCLC in first-line and subsequent indications. It has different adverse effects with respect to traditional antineoplastics, given the stimulation of the immune system. Objective: analyze whether patients with a good prognosis lung cancer immunotherapy prognostic index (LIPI) have a better response to ICI and also to evaluate the relation of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and response in patients with NSCLC in real clinical practice.

Methods

Observational, retrospective, single-center study. Cohort of stage IV NSCLC patients between 2016 and 2021. Toxicity grade (1–4) according to The Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. Response assessment according to RECIST 2.0 and immuno-related criteria. ICI in first (65%) or second (35%) line. Descriptive and survival analysis. Degree of toxicity and response to treatment (overall results and according to treatments and histology). LIPI index and response. LIPI defined as: dNLR (absolute neutrophil count/[white blood cell count − absolute neutrophil count]) ≥3 and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) greater than the upper limit of normal; stratifies patients in “good” (G), “intermediate” (I) and “poor” (P) prognostic groups.

Results

N = 168 patients (p) (130 men/38 woman). Mean age 64.3 years. Mean dNLR 2.46. Average LDH 244U/L. Response: 15 (9%) complete response (CR), 50 (30%) partial response (PR), 39 (22%) stable disease (SD), 45 (28%) progression disease (PD) and 19 (11%) not evaluated (NE). 114 deaths (56% G, 76% I, 93% P). PFS (G 19 months, I 6, P 2) and OS (G 27 months, I 8, P 3). Adenocarcinoma 116 [77 with irAES G1-4 (13 CR, 31 PR, 21 SD, 8 PD, 4 NE), 39 without (3 PR, 6 SD, 21 PD, 9 NE]. Squamosus 52 [27 with irAES G1-4 (2 CR, 12 PR, 9 SD, 4 PD), 25 without (4 PR, 3 SD, 12 PD, 6 NE).] irAES appearance: longer PFS (19 vs 2 months) and OS (27 vs 4 months) p < 0.0001.

Conclusions

Good prognosis LIPI score patients (dNRL<3 and normal LDH) present a better response to ICI. LIPI index is a positive predictor of response to ICI. The presence of irAES is related with a better immune system response. In contrast, the absence of toxicity predicts a worse prognosis.

Legal entity responsible for the study

Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.