Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

203P - MET gene copy number heterogeneity in non-small cell lung cancer patients resistant to EGFR-TKIs

Date

31 Mar 2023

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Qianming Bai

Citation

Journal of Thoracic Oncology (2023) 18 (4S): S149-S153.
<article-id>elcc_Ch10

Authors

Q. Bai1, Y. Chen2, X. Xiao3, H. Chang2, B. Xin3, L. Jia2, J. Li3, Z. Wang2, C. Yu2, H. Xiong4, X. Zhou2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Shanghai/CN
  • 2 Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai/CN
  • 3 Shanghai Yuanqi Biomedical Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai/CN
  • 4 Shanghai Rightongene Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Shanghai/CN

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 203P

Background

Accumulated evidences have demonstrated that mesenchymal epithelial transition (MET) amplification is one of the main mechanisms of epidermal growth factor receptor–tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) resistance in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Thus, accurate detection of MET gene copy number (GCN) is essential for the treatment of advanced NSCLC patients resistant to EGFR-TKIs. Herein, we analyzed MET GCN variants including amplification and polysomy in NSCLC patients with resistance to EGFR-TKIs.

Methods

Sixty-nine NSCLC patients resistant to first/second-generation EGFR-TKIs and 63 patients resistant to third-generation EGFR-TKIs were enrolled in this study. MET GCN was detected by FISH using MET and centromere (CEP7) probes in all cases, and by NGS in 38 patients resistant to third-generation EGFR-TKIs.

Results

Compared with NSCLC patients resistant to first/second-generation EGFR-TKIs, both incidences of GCN variants [amplification+polysomy, 11.6% (8/69) vs. 42.9% (27/63), P < 0.001] and amplification [5.8% (4/69) vs. 27.0% (17/63), P = 0.001] were significantly increased in patients resistant to third-generation EGFR-TKIs by FISH. Interestingly, heterogeneity of MET GCN variants, including 7 cases with MET amplification and 1 case with polysomy, was observed only in patients resistant to third-generation EGFR-TKIs, but not in patients resistant to first/second-generation EGFR-TKIs (8/27 vs. 0/8, P = 0.156), although the difference was not statistically significant due to the limited cases. Of 38 cases detected by NGS, 100% (7/7) of patients with FISH homogeneous MET amplification was identified as positivity for MET copy number gain, while only 33.3% (2/6) of heterogeneous amplification and 20.0% (1/5) of polysomy were MET positive.

Conclusions

Higher incidence and heterogeneity of MET GCN variants were demonstrated in NSCLC patients resistant to third-generation EGFR-TKIs than patients resistant to first/second-generation EGFR-TKIs. In technology, FISH showed advantages in detection of MET GCN as compared with NGS. Collectively, these results may provide a guiding role in the accurate detection of MET GCN and subsequent treatments.

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Shanghai Rightongene Biotechnology Co., Ltd.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.