Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

88P - Uncertain resection for localized cN0M0 non-small cell lung cancer: The crucial prognosis of suboptimal lymph node assessment

Date

03 Apr 2022

Session

Poster Display session

Topics

Tumour Site

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Presenters

Romain Vergé

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2022) 33 (suppl_2): S71-S78. 10.1016/annonc/annonc857

Authors

R. Vergé, A. Rouch, C. Renaud, L. Mazzoni, M. Cazaux, P. Rabinel, L. Brouchet

Author affiliations

  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse - Hopital Larrey, Toulouse/FR

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 88P

Background

Surgery remains the gold standard in the treatment of early stages of lung cancer.To achieve longer overall survival, complete resection of the tumor and careful lymphadenectomy are essential. The concept of uncertain resection R(un) was defined in 2005 by IASLC to highlight inadequate and limited resections and focused on intraoperative lymph node assessment. Although complete lymphadenectomy is recommended even in cN0M0 patients, the effect of R(un) in these patients has never been studied.

Methods

We include cN0M0 patients who underwent an anatomical lung resection for NSCLC from 2008 to 2018 at Toulouse University Hospital. We retrospectively reclassified tumours according to IASLC R-status based on pathologist reports. The primary outcome was overall patient survival according to the R classification system. Secondary outcomes were to determine whether uncertain resection was an independent factor in mortality, to highlight heterogenity of R(un) to perform subcategorization predicting survival.

Results

Of the 1108 cN0M0 patients, we identified 732 (66.1%) R0 patients, 291 (26.2%) R(un) patients, and 85 (7.7%) R1 patients. There was a significant difference in survival according to R status (p<0.0001). The impact of complete resection was confirmed in the adjusted models, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.26 (95% CI: 1.01-1.59) between R0 and R(un) patients and 2.41 (95% CI: 1.76-3.30) between R0 and R1 patients. We found substantial heterogeneity among R(un) patients with significantly different survival according to the R(un) definition criteria. Therefore, we defined 3 new subgroups of R(un) to discriminate between populations of homogeneous survival. R(un)c included all patients with lymph node involvement of the highest mediastinal node. R(un)b included patients with less than 3 mediastinal lymph node sites examined or no station 7 nodes examined. All other R(un) patients who did not meet the above criteria were classified as R(un)a.

Conclusions

Our study demonstrated the validity of the IASLC R classification in cN0M0 patients. By demonstrating the heterogeneity of R(un)patients, we proposed the creation of subcategories to highlight the critical problem of suboptimal lymph node assessment.

Legal entity responsible for the study

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse - Hopital Larrey, Toulouse.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.