Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

69P - Tumor invasiveness, response to ALK inhibitors and resistance mechanism in NSCLC with different ALK variants

Date

03 Apr 2022

Session

Poster Display session

Topics

Tumour Site

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Presenters

Zihua Zou

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2022) 33 (suppl_2): S27-S70. 10.1016/annonc/annonc856

Authors

Z. Zou1, X. Hao1, Y. Li1, P. Xing2, J. Ying1, J. Li1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College - National Cancer Center, Cancer Hospital, Beijing/CN
  • 2 Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College - National Cancer Center, Cancer Hospital, 100021 - Beijing/CN

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 69P

Background

Scholars had made much progress on the investigation about tumor invasiveness, response to ALK inhibitors and resistance mechanism in different ALK variants, however, these studies had reached inconsistent conclusions. We conducted this research with relatively larger sample size to make more comprehensive analysis.

Methods

Medical records of ALK+ NSCLC patients with stage III/IV or with recurrence after the surgery who received first-line alectinib or crizotinib were retrospectively collected in our center. Information of ALK variants was confirmed through the detection of patient’s samples either at the time of diagnosis or progression. We analyzed the tumor invasiveness, response to ALK inhibitors, progression pattern and resistance mechanism in different ALK variants. Shorter EML4 variants included EML4 fusions up to exon 6 and longer EML4 variants contained EML4 fusions at least exon 13.

Results

120 patients were included in our research(alectinib cohort: n=61, crizotinib cohort: n=59). Shorter EML4-variants were identified in 42 patients while 59 patients carried longer EML4-variants. The extent of tumor dissemination before the initiation of targeted therapy was similar between shorter and longer variants. In alectinib cohort, shorter forms presented numerically lower response rate than their counterparts(75% vs 95.5%, p=0.141), meanwhile, patients with shorter variants experienced significantly unfavorable PFS(NE vs NE, p=0.0453, HR=3.24(95%CI: 0.94 to 11.2)), however, this was not the case in patients treated with first-line crizotinib(ORR: 85% vs 91.7%, p=0.828, PFS: 11.0m vs 12.9m, p=0.349,HR=1.3(95%CI: 0.72 to 2.3)). Higher frequency of ALK secondary mutation(64.7% vs 38.5%, p=0.269)was reported in shorter forms, additionally, for patients who developed ALK secondary mutation, G1202R was much more common in shorter EML4 variants(90.9% vs 0%,p=0.001).

Conclusions

Our study indicated different response to ALK inhibitors and resistance mechanism between shorter and longer EML4-variants, therefore, more pertinent treatment strategy was in need of further exploration for different ALK variants.

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.