Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

55P - The impact of liquid next-generation testing timing on treatment-naïve advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A prospective observational study

Date

03 Apr 2022

Session

Poster Display session

Topics

Tumour Site

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Presenters

CHINGYAO YANG

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2022) 33 (suppl_2): S27-S70. 10.1016/annonc/annonc856

Authors

C. YANG1, W. Liao2, C. Ho2, C. Hsu1, T. Tsai1, S. Wu3, Y. Lin4, W. Hsu2, J.C.C. Yang5, C. Yu6, P. Yang1

Author affiliations

  • 1 National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City/TW
  • 2 National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei/TW
  • 3 National Taiwan University Hospital Cancer Center, Taipei City/TW
  • 4 National Taiwan University Cancer Center, Taipei/TW
  • 5 National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University Cancer Center, Taipei/TW
  • 6 National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch, Hsinchu County/TW

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 55P

Background

Liquid next-generation sequencing (NGS) of plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has become a promising tool for the identification of driver mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Whether liquid NGS performed immediately at the start of tumor workup could further enhance NSCLC patient survival is unclear.

Methods

The prospective randomized observational study enrolled patients with suspicious advanced NSCLC. All the eligible patients received liquid NGS (Guardant360) immediately at the first visit and were randomized into two groups: Group A patients obtained the NGS results after the pathological diagnosis and the molecular testing (EGFR, ALK, ROS1, and BRAF) turned out; group B patients were informed of the NGS results once the test had been completed. The primary endpoint was the time-to-treatment of NSCLC. Other cancer-related outcomes were analyzed.

Results

A total of 180 patients were enrolled in our study, with 87 in group A and 93 in group B. Subjects with benign disease, other cancer types, small cell lung cancer, early-stage NSCLC were excluded, and there were 63 group A patients and 59 group B advanced NSCLC patients entering the final analysis. Most of the patients were adenocarcinoma (group A: 49 of 63, 77.8%; group B: 47 of 59, 79.7%). The prevalence of EGFR in the two groups was also similar, with 57.1% (36 of 63) in group A and 56.6% (34 of 59) in group B. Other driver mutations were rare in the two groups (group A: 2 ALK, 1 ROS1; group B: 2 BRAF and 1 MET exon 14 skipping). The median time to treatment of group A vs B was 33 vs 20 days (p-value <0.0001). The result was similar in patients receiving targeted therapy or chemo/immunotherapies. Among EGFR mutant patients who were treated with EGFR TKI, the ORR and PFS did not differ in group A and B (A vs B: ORR 53.6% vs 72%, p=0.384; PFS NE vs 11.9 months, p=0.280). However, in patients treated with immunotherapy with or without chemotherapy, group B patients seemed to have a longer PFS (A vs B, 4.5 vs NE months, p=0.041).

Conclusions

Performing liquid NGS as an initial approach of advanced NSCLC tumor workup can shorten the interval between diagnosis to anti-cancer treatment and perhaps may improve survival in selected patients. Long term follow-up of our study is ongoing.

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

YongLin Healthcare Foundation.

Disclosure

S. Wu: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Roche; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Boehringer Ingelheim; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Eli Lilly; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Pfizer; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Novartis; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: MSD; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Ono Pharmaceutical; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Chugai Pharmaceutical; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Bristol Myers Squibb. Y. Lin: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: ACT genomics; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Boehringer Ingelheim; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Bristol Myers Squibb; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Chugai Pharmaceutical; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Eli Lilly; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Janssen; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Manudipharma; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: MSD; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Novartis; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Pfizer; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Roche; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Takeda; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: TTY Biopharm; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel expense: Pfizer. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.