Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

E-Poster Display

1395P - Who will maintain as long-term responders more than 3 years with first- or second-generation EGFR TKI among EGFR mutant NSCLC?

Date

17 Sep 2020

Session

E-Poster Display

Topics

Tumour Site

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Presenters

Ja Hyun Yeo

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_4): S754-S840. 10.1016/annonc/annonc283

Authors

J.H. Yeo, S.H. Park, H.A. Jung, J. Sun, S.H. Lee, J.S. Ahn, K. Park, M. Ahn

Author affiliations

  • Division Of Hematology-oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 135-710 - Seoul/KR

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1395P

Background

Although osimertinib is a preferred first-line EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) in patients with EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) based on longer progression free survival (PFS) and high CNS efficacy, other first- or second-generation EGFR TKIs (gefitinib, erlotinib or afatinib) still remain as treatment options. Since long-term responders (LTR) with first- or second-generation EGFR TKIs are often noted in proportion of patients in real world, it would be valuable to determine patient characteristics associated with long-term responders considering sequential approach of EGFR TKI in the management of EGFR-mutant NSCLC.

Methods

We analyzed EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC patients treated with first-line gefitinib, erlotinib or afatinib from Jan 2013 to Dec 2016. LTRs were defined as patients whose PFS is longer than 36 months. We compared patient characteristics and other clinical outcomes between LTR group and control group.

Results

Of the 931 patients treated with first-line EGFR-TKI other than osimertinib, 140 (15.0%) patients were LTRs; gefitinib (n=85, 60.7%), erlotinib (n=22, 15.7 %), and afatinib (n=33, 23.6%), respectively. With median follow-up of 59.5 months, median PFS was 54.1 months and overall survival was not reached in the LTR group. Patients with recurrent disease (OR 0.40, p<0.001), Exon 19 deletion (OR 0.58, p=0.007) and without wet pleura (OR 3.11, p<0.001), bone (OR 1.93, p=0.003), CNS (OR 1.69, p=0.018) or other extrathoracic organ (OR 7.09, p=0.001) metastases were associated with LTRs.

Conclusions

In real world data, 15% of patients can achieve more than 3 years of treatment duration with first- or second-generation EGFR TKI alone. Given insufficient availability of osimertinib as first-line therapy in many countries and lack of established salvage therapy against osimertinib-resistant NSCLC, our results suggest that first- or second-generation EGFR TKIs can be considered for patients with recurrent disease, exon 19 deletion, and without wet pleura metastases as well as extrathoracic metastases.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.