Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

E-Poster Display

1551P - Validation of response and survival biomarkers in a phase II trial of BPM 31510-IV in advanced refractory pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC)

Date

17 Sep 2020

Session

E-Poster Display

Topics

Tumour Site

Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Presenters

Vivek Subbiah

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_4): S881-S897. 10.1016/annonc/annonc285

Authors

V. Subbiah1, M.D. Nastke2, G.M. Miller2, P. Shah2, S. Gesta2, L.O. Rodrigues2, E. Granger2, N.R. Narain2, M.A. Kiebish2, R. Sarangarajan2, M.N. Kundranda3

Author affiliations

  • 1 Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 77030 - Houston/US
  • 2 R&d, BERG, LLC, 01701 - Framingham/US
  • 3 Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Medical Oncology, Banner MD-Anderson, 85234 - Phoenix/US

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1551P

Background

Data driven discovery of surrogate markers of clinical endpoints has the potential utility to improve outcome for therapeutic development in PDAC. BERG’s Interrogative Biology® platform was employed to discover markers from Buffy Coat (BC) of a BPM 31510-IV Ph1 trial. The utility of these markers to predict Overall Survival (OS) was evaluated in Ph2 PDAC patients.

Methods

Proteomic markers of response were identified from treatment-naïve BC and longitudinal sampling post treatment of 104 patients in an all-comer solid tumor BPM 31510-IV Ph1. The Ph1 cohort was defined as no change/decrease (responders) or increase (non-responders) in tumor size (CT/MRI readout). Calculated slopes from tumor sizes defined treatment-response populations aligned with differentially expressed BC proteins in the Ph1 cohort were generated. To identify markers predictive of response and OS, the presence/absence of Ph1 identified BC proteins were analyzed in Ph2 PDAC patients who met criteria of adequately treated cohort (ATC- received BPM 31510-IV + gemcitabine for >30 days and had RECIST 1.1 evaluation).

Results

Of the 35 PDAC Ph2 patients, initial data demonstrate 18 met ATC criteria. To date half of the ATC population (n = 9/18, 50%) had best overall response rate of stable disease (SD) and 8/18 (44%) had SD at end of Cycle 2. Of the proteins differentially expressed in BC in phase I cohort with increasing or decreasing tumor size, two were differentially expressed in phase II patients between responders (SD) and non-responders (PD). Moreover, two proteins predictive of OS, defined as ≤2 or >2 treatment cycles, were identified, one overlapping in SD and OS.

Conclusions

BERG’s Interrogative Biology® platform applied to BC samples of BPM 31510-IV Ph1 trial has identified two potential biomarkers predictive of response and survival in PDAC patients. Candidate biomarkers had independent confirmation of prediction between SD, PD, and OS in a phase II trial. The influence of BC markers in influencing immune response in combination with BPM 31510-IV in PDAC is being investigated.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

BERG LLC.

Funding

BERG LLC.

Disclosure

V. Subbiah: Advisory/Consultancy: MedImmune; Advisory/Consultancy, Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Helsinn Therapeutics; Advisory/Consultancy: Loxo; Advisory/Consultancy: R-Pharma-US; Advisory/Consultancy: QED Pharma; Research grant/Funding (institution): Novartis; Research grant/Funding (institution): GlaxoSmithKline; Research grant/Funding (institution): NanoCarrier; Research grant/Funding (institution): Northwest Biotherapeutics; Research grant/Funding (institution): Genentech/Roche ; Research grant/Funding (institution): Berg Pharma; Research grant/Funding (institution), Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Bayer; Research grant/Funding (institution): Incyte; Research grant/Funding (institution): Fujifilm; Research grant/Funding (institution), Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: PharmaMar; Research grant/Funding (institution): D3 Oncology Solutions; Research grant/Funding (institution): Pfizer; Research grant/Funding (institution): Amgen; Research grant/Funding (institution): AbbVie; Research grant/Funding (institution): Multivir; Research grant/Funding (institution): Blueprint; Research grant/Funding (institution): Medicines; Research grant/Funding (institution): LOXO; Research grant/Funding (institution): Vegenics; Research grant/Funding (institution): Takeda; Research grant/Funding (institution): Alfasigma; Research grant/Funding (institution): Agensys; Research grant/Funding (institution): Idera; Research grant/Funding (institution): Boston Biomedical; Research grant/Funding (institution): Inhibrx; Research grant/Funding (institution): Exelixis; Research grant/Funding (institution): Amgen; Research grant/Funding (institution): Turningpoint Therapeutics; Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Medscape. M.D. Nastke, G.M. Miller, P. Shah, S. Gesta, L.O. Rodrigues, E. Granger, N.R. Narain, M.A. Kiebish, R. Sarangarajan: Full/Part-time employment: BERG LLC. M.N. Kundranda: Advisory/Consultancy: Bayer/Amgen; Research grant/Funding (institution): Celgene.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.