Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

E-Poster Display

302P - Utility of lymphocyte-monocyte ratio (LMr) for predicting progression free survival (PFS) in patients with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC) treated with palbocilcib + fulvestrant as first-line therapy

Date

17 Sep 2020

Session

E-Poster Display

Topics

Tumour Site

Breast Cancer

Presenters

Lucrezia Raimondi

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_4): S348-S395. 10.1016/annonc/annonc268

Authors

L. Raimondi1, M. Pietranera2, L. Rossi3, A. Di Rocco4, E. Gozzi1, G. Cimino3, G.P. Spinelli1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Department Of Medical-surgical Sciences And Biotechnologies, Sapienza University Of Rome, ., UOC Territorial Oncology- Aprilia (LT) – ASL Latina, University of Rome “Sapienza”, 04100 - Latina/IT
  • 2 Centro Medico Diagnostico, Salus, 00053 - Civitavecchia/IT
  • 3 Department Of Medical-surgical Sciences And Biotechnologies, Sapienza University Of Rome, ., UOC Territorial Oncology- Aprilia (LT) – ASL Latina, University of Rome “Sapienza”, Latina/IT
  • 4 Department Of Public Health And Infectious Diseases, Sapienza - University of Rome, Roma/IT

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 302P

Background

Despite CDK4/6 inhibitors are the new standard of care in HR+/HER2-MBC, it was recognized not all patients (pts) benefit from the combination Palbociclib+Fulvestrant (P+F). Low lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMr), a marker of host inflammation, was associated with worse PFS in several tumor types, but have not been analysed extensively in breast cancer in the era of P+F. In this study we evaluated the utility of LMr for predicting PFS in HR+/HER2-MBC treated with P+F as first-line.

Methods

In this retrospective study, conducted in the UOC Territorial Oncology–Aprilia (ASL Latina, University of Rome “Sapienza”), we analyzed a consecutive cohort of 106 pts with HR+/HER2-MBC treated with P+F as first-line therapy between Dec2017 and Mar2020. Pre-treatment LMr was calculated by division of lymphocytes by monocytes measured in peripheral blood. ROC curves and AUC were used to determine the optimal cut-off value of LMr that was 5.2 (Youden Index). Using the univariate analysis of Cox Proportional hazard model and survival curves estimated using the method of Kaplan and Meier, we analyzed the correlation between LMr and PFS.

Results

The pts’median age was 59 years [30–81]. The median LMr level was 5.81 [1.2-20]: in 54% (57 pts) we observed a LMr <5,2 and in 46% (49 pts) a LMr >5,2. Lower LMr was associated with worse outcome (p<0.001). After a median follow up of 18 months [1-NA], pts with LMr <5,2 had a median PFS of 3 months [1-6 months, 95% CI 0.8-3.6], contrary to pts with LMr>5.2 whose PFS has not yet been reached. Inclusion of LMr in multivariable models significantly improved prediction of PFS in this subset of pts.

Conclusions

Despite the study’s limitations, our results suggest the utility of LMr analisys before starting P+F treatment to predict who will take advantage from this combination of drugs. It may lead to personalize management in HR+/HER2-MBC decreasing wastes of resources for the National Health System ensuring the best pts’ quality of life.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

ASL Latina-University of Rome “Sapienza”.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.