Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

E-Poster Display

1002P - Usefulness of hand-foot skin reaction as a prognostic marker in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sorafenib: Close cooperation between pharmacists and oncologist changes prognosis

Date

17 Sep 2020

Session

E-Poster Display

Topics

Tumour Site

Hepatobiliary Cancers

Presenters

Toshiro Kamoshida

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_4): S629-S644. 10.1016/annonc/annonc278

Authors

T. Kamoshida1, M. Ochi1, T. Ikegami2, M. Araki3, Y. Yamaguchi1, Y. Hamano1, H. Ohkawara1, A. Ohkawara1, N. Kakinoki1, S. Hirai1, A. Yanaka4

Author affiliations

  • 1 Gastroenterology Department, Hitachi General Hospital, 317-0077 - Hitachi/JP
  • 2 Division Of Gastroenterology And Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University Ibaraki Medical Center, 300-0395 - Ami Town/JP
  • 3 Department Of Gastroenterology And Hepatology, Ibaraki Prefectural Central Hospital, Ibaraki Cancer, 309-1793 - Kasama City/JP
  • 4 Hitachi Society Cooperation Education Research Center, University of Tsukuba, 317-0077 - Hitachi/JP

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1002P

Background

Sorafenib is a first-line oral drug for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR) is a common adverse effect of sorafenib in HCC patients, is difficult to manage, and has a negative impact on quality of life. However, HFSR may also be a prognostic marker in these patients. Adherence to sorafenib needs to be increased by interventions to address adverse effects and discontinuation. Thus, our aim was to assess the impact of different interventions for HFSR on patient prognosis.

Methods

In total, 137 patients treated with sorafenib between 2009 and 2019 were enrolled in this multi-institutional study. Group A (n = 41) did not receive HFSR or pharmacist interventions, while Group B (n = 30) and Group C (n = 66) received both. In Groups B and C, pharmacists provided care and advice for adverse events, tablet counts, and telephone consultations. In Group C, information obtained in interviews with pharmacists was shared with oncologists in reports and medical charts (cooperative double check system). In Group B, this information was not provided to oncologists (uncooperative double check system).

Results

Median overall survival (mOS) was 7.2 months for Group A, 8.5 months for Group B, and 18.2 months for Group C. On comparison among the three groups, a significant difference was observed between Groups A and C (p = 0.04). In the multivariate analysis, HFSR was the only significant prognostic marker (hazard ratio 0.51, 95% CI 0.30-0.86, p = 0.01). Time-to-treatment failure (TTF) was 2.3 months for Group A, 0.5 months for Group B, and 4.1 months for Group C. TTF significantly decreased in Group B only (p <0.01). mOS correlated with TTF in Group C with a Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient of 0.41 (p <0.01), but not in Group B.

Conclusions

The emergence of HFSR significantly improved patient prognosis under appropriate adherence. The cooperative double check system increased adherence, and a correlation was observed between mOS and TTF. The cooperative double check system needs to be implemented for sorafenib.

Clinical trial identification

UMIN ID: 000038701, 11/27/2019.

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.