Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

E-Poster Display

794P - UK practices for treatment of relapse in seminoma testicular cancer

Date

17 Sep 2020

Session

E-Poster Display

Topics

Tumour Site

Malignant Germ-Cell Tumours of the Adult Male

Presenters

Johnathan Joffe

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_4): S550-S550. 10.1016/annonc/annonc274

Authors

J.K. Joffe1, F. Cafferty2, E. Butcher3, D. Noor4, G. Rustin5, R.S. Kaplan6, R.A. Huddart7

Author affiliations

  • 1 Oncology, Huddersfield Royal Infirmery, HD3 3EA - Huddersfield/GB
  • 2 Oncology, Medical Research Council, London/GB
  • 3 Statistics, University College London NHS Foundation Trust, NW1 2PG - London/GB
  • 4 Statistics, Medical Research Council, London/GB
  • 5 Oncology, Mount Vernon Cancer Center, London/GB
  • 6 Mrc Clinical Trials Unit, MRC Clinical Trials Unit-University College London, WC1V 6LJ - London/GB
  • 7 Radiotherapy And Imaging Dept., Royal Marsden Hospital Institute of Cancer Research, SM2 5NG - Sutton/GB

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 794P

Background

Outcomes for men with stage I seminoma are excellent and avoiding intensive chemotherapy in these young patients is important. CT surveillance is a standard of care following orchiectomy. 10-20% relapse, but treatment is curative in almost 100%. In an ongoing trial of surveillance in seminoma [TRISST, NCT00589537], RMH stage IIC or worse relapse is defined as the primary outcome, reflecting the watershed for treatment with combination chemotherapy (BEP/EP) when TRISST was initiated. To re-assess the relevance of this endpoint we planned to assess current UK practices in treating relapse.

Methods

In 2020, a survey of UK clinicians was conducted to determine factors affecting management decisions at relapse, and the treatments recommended according to tumour stage or size.

Results

28 clinicians (24 centres) responded representing the majority of UK centres treating testicular cancer. 23 (82%) consider both stage and IGCCCG factors in determining relapse treatment, either with (57%) or without (25%) tumour size. In stage IIC disease, of 27 respondents, all indicated use of BEP/EP (3/4 cycle) or 3-4 cycles of carboplatin AUC10 (HDC); with only 3 (11%) also considering radiotherapy (RT, with carboplatin AUC7x1) as an option. Treatment of IIB disease was more varied: whilst 9 (of 27 respondents, 33%) only use BEP/EP and 5 (19%) only use HDC, 13 (48%) use RT +/- carboplatin AUC7 as either the only treatment (9, 33%) or as an option (4, 15%). However, when size is considered: for >3cm relapses, patterns were similar to IIC disease, but below 3cm management of stage IIB disease was less consistent. A subgroup of respondents use BEP/EP or HDC for all stage of seminoma relapse. 3 cycles of BEP is the most common combination regimen (20, 71%).

Conclusions

Tumour size is significant in relapsed seminoma.

Clinical trial identification

MREC: 07/H1306/127 NCT00589537.

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Medical Research Council.

Funding

CTAC UK.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.