Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

E-Poster Display

1880P - Two thousand consecutive parallel evaluations of Karnofsky and ECOG performance status: looking for a correct comparison

Date

17 Sep 2020

Session

E-Poster Display

Topics

Supportive Care and Symptom Management

Tumour Site

Presenters

Agostino Ponzetti

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_4): S988-S1017. 10.1016/annonc/annonc291

Authors

A.P. Ponzetti, R. Laface, E. Milanesi, L. Ciuffreda

Author affiliations

  • Department Of Oncology And Hematology, Medical Oncology 1 division, "Città della Salute e della Scienza", 10124 - Turin/IT

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1880P

Background

Performance status (PS) is a strong, validated prognostic factor across all cancer types, especially in the advanced phase. It is estimated usually by the Karnofsky (KPS) or the ECOG scale, each of them having peculiar features. Two possible way of comparing KPS and ECOG scales are possibile, differing in the attribution of KPS 90,70, 50 and 30% respectively to PS 0,1,2 and 3 or to 1,2,3 and 4. From the limited data available, the latter comparison seems to better adapt to real-world clinical data (Verger E, Cancer 1992).

Methods

From 1st May 2019 to 19th May 2020 all the consecutive values of KPS and ECOG PS were simultaneously recorded from every clinical evaulation of three medical oncologists from the Lung Cancer Unit. In particular, KPS values were estimated with the help of specific questions involving the domain of daily self-dependence and self-care (Schag CC, JCO 1984). The attribution of KPS 90,70,50 and 30% to PS 0,1,2 and 3 or to PS 1,2,3 and 4 was defined respectively as the BOLD or the CONSERVATIVE comparison. Moreover, data about DISCORDANT cases (i.e. very different KPS and ECOG values) were analyzed.

Results

Values of KPS and ECOG PS from two-thousand consecutive clinical evaluations were collected, 86.5% conducted in an outpatient setting and 78.3% in patients affected by NSCLC or SCLC. Median age of patients was 68.2 years, male/female ratio was 2.26. Mean values of KPS and ECOG PS for the entire cohort were 79.98% and 1.1. The distribution of the attribution of KPS 90,70,50 and 30% to the BOLD or to the CONSERVATIVE comparison was: Table: 1880P

BOLD KPS (n.) CONSERVATIVE
PS 0: 53.3% (309) 90% (579) PS 1: 46.7% (270)
PS 1: 9,8% (35) 70% (357) PS 2: 90,2% (322)
PS 2: 2,9% (3) 50% (102) PS 3: 97,1% (99)
PS 3: 0% (0) 30% (8) PS 4: 100% (8)

Discordant KPS-ECOG values were identified in 16 cases (0.8%): 14 with KPS 60%-PS 3 (all cases with advanced thoracic cancers), 1 with 50%-PS 2, and 1 with 80%-PS 0.

Conclusions

In a real-practice population of aggressive cancers the CONSERVATIVE way of comparing ECOG PS and KPS seems to fit better the clinical data, especially when PS worsens (KPS 70, 50 or 30%). Further researches are however needed to improve the correlation of the two PS scales.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.