Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

E-Poster Display

1282P - Trial-based costs of all-cause adverse events in first-line therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: Findings from CheckMate-227

Date

17 Sep 2020

Session

E-Poster Display

Topics

Tumour Site

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Presenters

Solomon J Lubinga

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_4): S754-S840. 10.1016/annonc/annonc283

Authors

S.J. Lubinga1, S.B. King2, K.A. Betts3, S. Rao1, F. Castriota3, M. Mahin2, E. Orvis2, S. Marathe2, J. Ma3, D. Stenehjem4

Author affiliations

  • 1 Us Heor, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 08648 - Lawrenceville/US
  • 2 Analysis Group, Inc, 02199 - Boston/US
  • 3 Analysis Group, Inc, 90071 - Los Angeles/US
  • 4 College Of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, 55812 - Duluth/US

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1282P

Background

This study compared all-cause adverse event (ACAE) cost per patient of nivolumab + ipilimumab (N+I) vs. chemotherapy (C), pembrolizumab + chemotherapy (P+C), and atezolizumab + chemotherapy (A+C) as first-line therapy for Stage IV or recurrent non-small-cell lung cancer.

Methods

Grade 3/4 ACAE rates were obtained from individual patient data from the CheckMate (CM)-227 clinical trial and aggregate data from the KEYNOTE (KN)-189, KN-407, and IMpower130 (IM130) trials. Costs were obtained from the US Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. Within CM-227, N+I was compared vs. C overall and within programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) subgroups (≥1% and <1%). Grade 3/4 events for ACAEs meeting a ≥15% all-grade incidence threshold were included. For N+I vs. P+C and A+C, the threshold used in the comparator trial was applied to CM-227. Costs of C in each trial were also estimated. Non-squamous (NSQ) patients in CM-227 were compared to KN-189 and IM130; squamous (SQ) patients were compared to KN-407. Differences across trials were assessed both overall and adjusted for duration of treatment (DOT).

Results

Within CM-227, mean ACAE cost per patient for N+I vs. C was $2,013 vs. $3,236 in PD-L1 ≥1%, $2,300 vs. $4,735 in PD-L1 <1%, and $1,966 vs. $3,704 overall. Compared to P+C and A+C, N+I had lower costs (Table). Rates of hematological AEs were lower for N+I than comparators. Costs were higher when a lower incidence threshold was applied Table: 1282P

Cost of grade 3/4 ACAEs for N+I vs. P+C and A+C

CM-227 vs. KN-1891 NSQ CM-227 vs. KN-4071 SQ CM-227 vs. IM1302 NSQ
N+I P+C CCM-227 CKN-189 N+I P+C CCM-227 CKN-407 N+I A+C CCM-227 CIM130
[A] Mean cost per patient $2,088 $6,954 $3,725 $5,429 $2,817 $6,612 $8,087 $7,342 $7,877 $18,350 $8,018 $13,563
Diff. −$4,867 −$1,705 −$3,795 $745 −$10,473 −$5,545
[B] Mean DOT, mos. 7.4 7.4 5.9 5.4 7.5 6.3 2.1 4.7 7.4 8.9 5.9 3.6
[A] / [B] Mean cost per mo. $282 $940 $626 $1,005 $375 $1,050 $3,937 $1,562 $1,062 $2,062 $1,348 $3,737
Diff. −$658 −$379 −$675 $2,375 −$999 −$2,390

1. AEs with ≥15% any-grade incidence included2. AEs with ≥10% any-grade or ≥2% grade 3/4 incidence included3. Values may not sum due to rounding

.

Conclusions

N+I was associated with lower ACAE costs compared to C, P+C, and A+C.

Clinical trial identification

NCT02477826.

Editorial acknowledgement

Writing and editorial assistance was provided by Analysis Group, Inc., and funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb.

Legal entity responsible for the study

Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA.

Funding

Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA.

Disclosure

S.J. Lubinga, S. Rao: Shareholder/Stockholder/Stock options, Full/Part-time employment: Bristol-Myers Squibb. S.B. King, K.A. Betts: Research grant/Funding (institution), Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Bristol-Myers Squibb. F. Castriota, M. Mahin, E. Orvis, S. Marathe, J. Ma: Research grant/Funding (institution): Bristol-Myers Squibb. D. Stenehjem: Advisory/Consultancy: Bristol-Myers Squibb.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.