Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

E-Poster Display

1054P - Treatment history affects bone marrow toxicity after conditioning non-myeloablative chemotherapy in adoptive cell therapy in non-melanoma cancer patients

Date

17 Sep 2020

Session

E-Poster Display

Topics

Immunotherapy

Tumour Site

Melanoma

Presenters

Anders Kverneland

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_4): S645-S671. 10.1016/annonc/annonc279

Authors

A.H. Kverneland1, T.H. Borch1, J. Granhøj1, M. Donia1, I. Svane2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Department Of Oncology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, 2730 - Herlev/DK
  • 2 Department Of Oncology, Herlev Hospital, 2730 - Herlev/DK

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1054P

Background

Conditioning lymphodepletive chemotherapy is an essential part of adoptive cell therapy (ACT) of cancer. ACT with tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) is in phase III clinical testing for malignant melanoma (MM) and with the advance into other cancer diagnoses it is important to evaluate the bone marrow (BM) toxicity of this therapy in patients with different therapeutic backgrounds.

Methods

Patients were treated in two clinical ACT trials (ovarian cancer NCT03287674 or across cancer types NCT03296137). All patients received identical regime of lymphodepleting chemotherapy consisting of 2 days of cyclophosphamide (60 mg/kg) followed by 5 days of fludarabine (25 mg/m2) before TILs. In addition, the treatment schedule included a short course of check point inhibitors and low dose interleukin-2.

Results

Thirty-one patients with 14 different cancer diagnoses including 6 patients with MM were treated between 2017 and 2019. All suffered grade 3-4 myelosuppression and the median length of neutropenia, anemia and thrombocytopenia were 8 days (range: 4-15), 12 days (range: 0-28) and 7 days (range: 0-19) respectively. Most patients required multiple blood- and platelet transfusions. All patients recovered from BM suppression without stem cell support, but many suffered from recurrent neutropenia, lymphopenia or thrombocytopenia following discharge. The duration of anemia, but not neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, was significantly related to the intensity of earlier chemotherapy regimens.

Conclusions

In conclusion, the conditioning chemotherapy was safe and tolerated in all melanoma and non-melanoma patients and induced a reversible myelosuppression. Our data show that the treatment history affects the severity of the BM toxicity during conditioning chemotherapy but without rendering it unsafe to use lymphodepleting chemotherapy in connection with ACT.

Clinical trial identification

NCT03287674; NCT03296137.

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Knæk Cancer.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.