Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

E-Poster Display

1179P - Therapeutic sequences in advanced grade 1-2 pancreatic neuroendocriene tumours (pNET)

Date

17 Sep 2020

Session

E-Poster Display

Topics

Tumour Site

Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

Presenters

Ilaria Maggio

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_4): S711-S724. 10.1016/annonc/annonc281

Authors

I. Maggio1, F. Panzuto2, L. Manuzzi1, V. Dall'Olio3, M. Rinzivillo2, D. Campana4, G. Lamberti4

Author affiliations

  • 1 Department Of Medical Oncology, Sant'Orsola Malpighi University Hospital, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, 40138 - Bologna/IT
  • 2 Digestive Disease Unit, Enets Center Of Excellence, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, 00189 - Rome/IT
  • 3 Department Of Medical Oncology, University of Bologna Alma Mater Studiorum, 40138 - Bologna/IT
  • 4 Net Team Bologna, Enets Center Of Excellence, Sant'Orsola Malpighi University Hospital, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, 40138 - Bologna/IT

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1179P

Background

There are several approved treatments in well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNET) but there is no evidence about the best therapeutic sequence for these patients (pts). The objective of this study was to identify the optimal therapeutic sequence.

Methods

We retrospectively collected data about pts with metastatic or locally advanced well-differentiated grade 1 or 2 pNET treated at 2 neuroendocrine neoplasia (NEN)-dedicated Italian Centers who received at least two lines of treatment for pNET. Radiological progressive disease must have had occurred before switching to the second line of treatment. Factors associated with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), including treatment sequences, were analyzed.

Results

Of the 68 included pts, 34 (50%) were male. Fifteen pts (22.1%) had a G1 pNET and 53 (77.9%) a G2 tumor, with median Ki67 of 6.9% (range 0.6-20). Four (5.9%) pts presented localized disease, 55 (80.9%) hepatic lesions, and 9 (13.2%) extrahepatic disease. Primary tumor had been resected in 40 pts (58.8%). First-line therapy was somatostatin analog (SSA) in 52,9%, SSA + peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (SSA+PRRT) in 30.9%, and everolimus (11.8%), chemotherapy (CHT) in 2,9%, and other in 1.5%. Second-line therapy was SSA in 8.8% of pts, high-dose SSA in 7.4%, SSA+PRRT in 9.1%, sunitinib in 11.8%, everolimus in 30.9%, CHT in 16.2%, and other in 5.9%. Median PFS was 14 mo (95%CI 6.9-21.1) for first line and 14.2 mo (95%CI 11.1-17.3) for second line. To evaluate which was the best therapeutic sequence, we compared outcome of 33 pts who received either first-line SSA+PRRT (concomitant) to first-line SSA followed by SSA+PRRT at progression (sequential). In this cohort, median time to strategy failure (TSF) was 46 mo (95%CI 35-56.9) and OS was 94.6 mo (95%CI 61.8-127.6). Median TSF was longer with the sequential than with the concomitant strategy (74.4 vs 40 months, respectively; p=0.007). At multivariate analysis, sequential therapy was associated with a reduced risk for progression (HR 0.28, 95%CI 0.11-0.74, p=0.011).

Conclusions

Sequential SSA-PRRT therapy was associated with improved TSF in patients with pNET.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Davide Campana.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.