Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

E-Poster Display

637P - The prognostic value of the baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) receiving radium-223 (Ra-223): A post-hoc analysis of the ALSYMPCA phase-III trial

Date

17 Sep 2020

Session

E-Poster Display

Topics

Tumour Site

Prostate Cancer

Presenters

Alexander Meisel

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_4): S507-S549. 10.1016/annonc/annonc275

Authors

A. Meisel1, C. Parker2, R. Kühne3, O. Sartor4, F. Stenner-Liewen5

Author affiliations

  • 1 Department Of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Zurich, 8091 - Zurich/CH
  • 2 Urology, The Institute of Cancer Research/Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, SM2 5PT - Sutton/GB
  • 3 Internal Medicine - Hematology & Oncology, Stadtspital Waid, 8091 - Zurich/CH
  • 4 Tulane Cancer Center, Tulane University School of Medicine, 70112 - New Orleans/US
  • 5 Department Of Oncology, Universitätsspital Basel, 4031 - Basel/CH

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 637P

Background

The NLR could be established as an important prognostic marker for the outcome of mCRPC patients treated with chemotherapy, steroids and novel androgen receptor directed therapies. Thus far the value of the NLR as a biomarker in the context of therapeutic radionuclides has never been explored.

Methods

The pivotal phase III trial of Ra-223 in mCRPC (ALSYMPCA) randomly assigned 921 patients, to Radium-223 or matching placebo in a 2:1 ratio. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). This post-hoc analysis investigated the role of NLR, neutrophilia (defined as an absolute neutrophil count > 7000 G/L) and lymphopenia (defined as an absolute lymphocyte count < 1.000 G/l) on the outcome of mCRPC patients treated with Ra-223 (n = 613). OS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazard models. Nominal p-values were determined by log-rank tests.

Results

In the intention-to-treat population NLR ≥ 3, NLR ≥ median and log transformed NLR were associated with a significantly shorter OS. Lymphopenia showed an even stronger association with OS and a median survival disadvantage of 6 months, while neutrophilia did not show any association with the outcome of Ra-223 treatment. Patients with a prognostically detrimental NLR ≥ 3 had the worst OS [HR 1.56 (95% CI 1.15 – 2.12)] when accompanied by additional lymphopenia compared to all other constellations of NLR ≥ 3. Table: 637P

Cut-off Median OS, months Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis#
NLR ≥ 3 13.1 HR 1.58, p < 0.001 HR 1.31, p = 0.028
< 3 17.2
NLR ≥ median 12.9 HR 1.56, p < 0.001 HR 1.29, p = 0.034
< median 17.0
NLR Log-transformed* HR 1.35, p < 0.001 HR 1.16, p = 0.029
Neutrophilia Yes 15.3 HR 1.01, p = 0.945 HR 1.04, p = 0.790
No 14.7
Lymphopenia Yes 10.1 HR 1.85, p < 0.001 HR 1.49, p = 0.002
No 16.1

*Log-transformed using base 2 so that HR associated with a unit change in log NLR represents a doubling of the NLR #Variables: total ALP, current use of bisphosphonates, prior use of docetaxel, pain at baseline, ECOG, extend of disease grading, baseline albumin, log LDH, log PSA, age

Conclusions

A high NLR is associated with a poorer OS in mCRPC patients treated with Ra-223 independently of the cut-off used. Lymphocytes seem to be the leucocyte subtype that has the strongest association with prognosis.

Clinical trial identification

NCT00699751.

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Bayer Healthcare.

Disclosure

A. Meisel: Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (self), Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Amgen; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy, Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Astellas; Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (self), Research grant/Funding (institution): Bayer; Advisory/Consultancy, Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Boehringer-Ingelheim; Advisory/Consultancy, Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: BMS; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy, Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Celgene; Advisory/Consultancy, Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Janssen; Advisory/Consultancy, Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Merck-Serono; Research grant/Funding (institution): Merck & Cie; Advisory/Consultancy: MSD; Advisory/Consultancy: Novartis; Advisory/Consultancy, Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Roche; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (institution), Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Sanofi; Advisory/Consultancy, Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Servier; Advisory/Consultancy: Takeda; Advisory/Consultancy: Vifor. C. Parker: Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy, Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Bayer; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy, Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Janssen. R. Kühne: Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy, Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Amgen; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy: Astellas; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy, Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: AstraZeneca; Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: BMS; Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Janssen; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy, Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: MSD; Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Roche. O. Sartor: Advisory/Consultancy: Advanced Accelerator Applications; Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (institution): AstraZeneca; Advisory/Consultancy: Astellas; Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (institution): Bayer; Advisory/Consultancy: Bellicum; Advisory/Consultancy: Blue Earth Diagnostics, Inc.; Advisory/Consultancy: Bravarian Nordic; Advisory/Consultancy: Bristol-Meyers-Squibb; Advisory/Consultancy: Clovis Oncology, Inc.; Advisory/Consultancy: Constellation; Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (institution): Dendreon; Advisory/Consultancy: EMD Serono; Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (institution): Invitae; Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (institution): Janssen Biotech, Inc.; Advisory/Consultancy: Myriad; Advisory/Consultancy: Noxopharm; Advisory/Consultancy: Progenics; Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (institution): Pfizer; Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (institution): Sanofi; Research grant/Funding (institution): Endocyte; Research grant/Funding (institution): Innocrin; Research grant/Funding (institution): SOTIO. F. Stenner-Liewen: Honoraria (institution), Advisory/Consultancy: AstraZeneca; Honoraria (institution), Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (institution): Bayer; Research grant/Funding (institution): BMS; Honoraria (institution), Advisory/Consultancy: Janssen; Honoraria (institution), Advisory/Consultancy: MSD; Honoraria (institution), Advisory/Consultancy, Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Roche; Honoraria (institution), Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (self), Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Sanofi.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.