Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

E-Poster Display

1045P - The prognostic value of derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in patients treated with checkpoint inhibitors

Date

17 Sep 2020

Session

E-Poster Display

Topics

Immunotherapy

Tumour Site

Presenters

William Mullally

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_4): S645-S671. 10.1016/annonc/annonc279

Authors

W.J. Mullally, J.P. Greene, T. Cahill, M.B. Ryan, A. Horgan, E.J. Jordan, M. O'Connor, P.M. Calvert

Author affiliations

  • Department Of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Waterford, X91 ER8E - Waterford/IE

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1045P

Background

An elevated derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (dNLR) has been correlated with worse outcomes across several malignancies and is also a known prognostic factor for patients on checkpoint inhibitors (CPI). However, the dNLR cut-off ranges from 3 to 5 and it’s unclear if dNLR variation while on CPI affects patient outcomes.

Methods

Prospectively maintained pharmacy databases in our regional cancer centre were interrogated for patients who were prescribed CPI in the advanced setting between January 2017 - 2020. Baseline patient characteristics were collated including dNLR {neutrophil count/ [white blood cell count – neutrophil count]} upon CPI commencement and repeated six weeks later.

Results

There were 102 patients with a median age of 69 years (range 30 - 88). Median follow-up was 7.8 months (Range 0.3 – 55.4 months). Seventy-three patients received prior systemic therapy (0 -3 lines). The median PFS for patients with a baseline dNLR > 3 when compared with a dNLR of ≤3 was 4.1 vs 14.2 months (p=0.001) and a similar comparison of the median OS was 6.4 vs 30.2 months (p=0.001). There were 10 patients who died before the six week dNLR change could be captured. Table: 1045P

Patient characteristics

Cancer n Previous treatment Pembrolizumab Nivolumab Atezolizumab dNLR > 3 dNLR ≤3
102 73 61 26 15 22 80
Melanoma 46 3 41 51 0 6 40
Lung 42 28 18 9 15 12 30
Squamous 20 13 9 3 8 7 13
Adeno 22 15 9 6 7 5 17
Renal & Bladder 6 6 1 5 0 0 6
Head & Neck 6 6 0 6 0 3 3
Others 2 2 1 1 0 1 1

1 Combination with ipilimumab. Patients in the dNLR > 3 cohort with a higher dNLR six weeks later had a significantly reduced median PFS when compared with decreased dNLR (3.6 vs 12.2 months, p=0.047). Similar analysis identified a significantly reduced median OS when higher dNLR was compared with decreased dNLR; 5.5 vs 16.3 months, p=0.008. In the dNLR ≤3 cohort, the two median PFS were statistically different (8.4 months vs not reached, p = 0.046). A similar analysis of the median OS identified a difference (24.2 months vs not reached) which approached significance (p=0.061).

Conclusions

We have a diverse patient population in our study and CPI reponse is likely to be multifactorial. However, patients with lower baseline dNLR have improved outcomes with CPI and therefore a dNLR < 3 could be used to select patients for CPI therapy.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.