Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

E-Poster Display

847P - The prognostic value of chemosensitivity, estimated by the modeled CA-125 KELIM, in ovarian cancer patients treated with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in the Netherlands

Date

17 Sep 2020

Session

E-Poster Display

Topics

Cytotoxic Therapy

Tumour Site

Ovarian Cancer

Presenters

Lilian Van Wagensveld

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_4): S551-S589. 10.1016/annonc/annonc276

Authors

L. Van Wagensveld1, O. COLOMBAN2, M. Van Der AA3, M. Tod4, G.S. Sonke5, R. KRUITWAGEN6, B. You7

Author affiliations

  • 1 Research, IKNL - Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, 3501 DB - Utrecht/NL
  • 2 Emr3738, Ciblage Thérapeutique En Oncologie, Faculté De Médecine Et De Maïeutique Lyon-sud Charles Mérieux, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 69921 - OULLINS/FR
  • 3 Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Amsterdam/NL
  • 4 Emr Ucbl/hcl 3738, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon/FR
  • 5 Department Of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, 1066 CX - Amsterdam/NL
  • 6 Department Of Obstetrics And Gynecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, maastricht/NL
  • 7 Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie des Hospices Civils de Lyon (IC-HCL); CITOHL; GINECO ; 1. Univ Lyon; Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1; Faculté de médecine Lyon-Sud; EMR UCBL/HCL 3738; Lyon; France, 69495 - Pierre Bénite/FR

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 847P

Background

Chemosensitivity and completeness of cytoreductive surgery (IDS) are important prognostic factors in advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Robust chemosensitivity markers are required to tailor treatment. This study aims to validate the prognostic value of the CA-125 ELIMination rate constant K (KELIM), as an early chemosensitivity marker, during neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in a population-based cohort.

Methods

Patients diagnosed with advanced stage (FIGO IIb-IV) EOC between 2008-2015 were identified from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Patients treated with NACT with >2 CA-125 measurements were included. CA-125 profiles were fit with a nonlinear mixed-effect model to calculate KELIM (with favorable KELIM >0.06 days-1). The predictive value of KELIM regarding completeness of IDS; progression-free survival (PFS); overall survival (OS); progression free survivorship (PS)(PFS > 5 years) were assessed using univariate and multivariate analyses.

Results

1582 patients were included. In multivariable logistic regression, higher std KELIM was prognostic for a higher likelihood of complete IDS (OR=5.25, 95% 3.68-7.59). In multivariable cox regression, OS was significantly associated with a favorable KELIM (HR = 0.75, 95%CI 0.65-0.87), high-risk disease (FIGO IV or III + incomplete IDS) (HR = 1.63, 95%CI 1.40-1.89) and tumor response rate (complete(CR) or partial remission(PR) after treatment)(HR = 0.41, 95%CI 0.33-0.50). PFS was associated with a favorable KELIM (HR = 0.77, 95%CI 0.67-0.89), high-risk disease (HR = 1.67, 95%CI 1.44-1.94) and tumor response rate (CR/PR)(HR 0.35, 95%CI 0.28-0.43). 2.2% of patients were progression-free survivors. In multivariable logistic regression high-risk disease (OR=0.19, 95% CI 0.08-0.42) and std KELIM (OR=4.17, 95% CI 1.61-10.64) were prognostic for PS. Patients with FIGO IV and a favorable KELIM had no survival benefit in case of incomplete IDS compared to no IDS at all.

Conclusions

This large population-based cohort confirms that KELIM during NACT exhibits an independent prognostic value for completeness of IDS, PFS, OS and progression free survivorship.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Dutch Cancer Society [IKNL2014-6838].

Disclosure

L. Van Wagensveld: Research grant/Funding (institution): Dutch Cancer Society [IKNL2014-6838]. G.S. Sonke: Advisory/Consultancy: AstraZeneca, Merck, Novartis, and Roche. B. You: Advisory/Consultancy: AZ, GSK, Novartis, Bayer, Roche, Clovis, Amgen, MSD, ECS Progastrin; Full/Part-time employment: Lyon University Hospital (HCL) and Lyon University. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.