Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

E-Poster Display

1040P - The prognostic role of “drug score” on the outcome of advanced cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

Date

17 Sep 2020

Session

E-Poster Display

Topics

Immunotherapy

Tumour Site

Presenters

Fabiana Perrone

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_4): S645-S671. 10.1016/annonc/annonc279

Authors

F. Perrone1, M. Bersanelli1, A. Cortellini2, C. Casartelli1, P. Bordi1, M. Tiseo1, S. Buti1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 - Parma/IT
  • 2 Medical Oncology Unit, St. Salvatore Hospital, 67100 - L'Aquila/IT

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1040P

Background

Immune checkpoints inhibitors (ICIs) alone or in combination (with chemotherapy or tyrosine kinase inhibitors) are the new standard of treatment in several solid tumors. The different impact of single concomitant drugs on the outcome of ICI treated patients is already known. The aim of our study was to evaluate the prognostic value of a “drug score” (DS), including three class of drugs able to modulate the microbiota, in metastatic cancer patients treated with ICIs.

Methods

We retrospectively enrolled advanced patients consecutively treated with ICI at our center from October 2013 to October 2018, correlating the DS with overall survival (OS, primary endpoint) and progression-free-survival (PFS, secondary endpoint).

Results

219 patients were enrolled. Primary tumors were: non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC, 69.9%), melanoma (15.1%), renal cell carcinoma (9.1%), other cancers (5.5%). Median follow-up was 21.3 months. 12.3% and 33.8% of patients received antibiotics and corticosteroids within 30 days before first ICI administration, respectively; 47.9% of patients underwent treatment with pump protonic inhibitors (PPIs). The use of PPIs, corticosteroids or antibiotics was individually associated to decreased OS and PFS at the univariate analysis. Therefore, we developed a “drug score” including these three drugs. 37.9% of patients did not receive any drug (DS 0), 35.2% received only one drug (DS 1) and 26.9% received two/three drugs (DS 2). The impact of DS on both OS and PFS was evident: median OS was 19.4 months in DS 0 vs9.5 months in DS 1 vs2.7 months in DS 2 (p < 0.001), median PFS was 6.8 months in DS 0 vs3.7 months in DS 1 vs 1.6 in DS 2 (p< 0.001). On multivariate analysis, only the comparison between DS 2 vsDS 0 resulted statistically significant, both in terms of OS [HR 1.88 (95%CI 1.18-3.01), p= 0.0082] and PFS [HR 2.12 (95%CI 1.33-3.38), p= 0.0017].

Conclusions

Our results confirmed the negative prognostic role of PPIs, corticosteroids and antibiotics either as single agents and included in the DS, probably due to the impact of these drugs on gut and lung microbiota. DS will be validated in an extended multicenter retrospective cohort including patients with metastatic NSCLC treated with ICIs.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

University Hospital of Parma.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

M. Bersanelli: Research grant/Funding (self): Seqirus; Research grant/Funding (self): Roche; Research grant/Funding (self): Pfizer; Research grant/Funding (self): Novartis; Research grant/Funding (self): BMS; Research grant/Funding (self): Sanofi; Research grant/Funding (self): AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self): BMS; Honoraria (self): Pfizer; Honoraria (self): Seqirus; Honoraria (self): Ipsen; Honoraria (self): AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self): Novartis. A. Cortellini: Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: AstraZeneca; Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: MSD; Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Astellas; Research grant/Funding (self): AstraZeneca; Research grant/Funding (self): BMS; Research grant/Funding (self): MSD; Research grant/Funding (self): Novartis. M. Tiseo: Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Research grant/Funding (self): Boehringer Ingelheim; Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Research grant/Funding (self): AstraZeneca; Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: MSD; Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: BMS; Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Takeda. S. Buti: Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: BMS; Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Pfizer; Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: MSD; Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Ipsen; Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: AstraZeneca; Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Novartis. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.