Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

E-Poster Display

92P - The prognosis and predictive value of the negative estrogen/positive progesterone breast cancer profile (ER- / PR +): Moroccan experience

Date

17 Sep 2020

Session

E-Poster Display

Topics

Targeted Therapy

Tumour Site

Breast Cancer

Presenters

Sanaa Gamrani

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_4): S274-S302. 10.1016/annonc/annonc266

Authors

S. Gamrani, H. EL FATEMI

Author affiliations

  • Medical Centre Of Biomedical And Translational Researchers, Anatomic Pathology Department, Chu Hassan Ii Of Fes, CHU - University Hospital of Hassan II, 30000 - Fez/MA

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 92P

Background

The breast cancer endocrine therapy is importantly related to the expression of the steroid hormones, estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR). They are one of the most efficace prognostics factors and predictive markers in the hormonal treatment. Progesterone receptors are often tested in parallel with estrogen receptor because extensive studies have shown that PR expression is conditional on ER activity. It is easier to decide treatment strategies in cases of double-positive/negative steroid hormones. On the other side, the existence of breast cancer with ER negative/PR positive phenotype is contentious. To describe the clinical features and outcomes of estrogen receptor negative (ER-) and progesterone receptor positive (PR+),

Methods

we have retrospectively examined a large (1182 cases) and well-characterized database of primary breast cancer from 2012 to 2019. The cases were stratified according to ER and PR expression and we were focused on ER-/PR+ group to highlight their features and to figure any prognosis and predictive value in comparison with ER+/PR- and double positive/negative tumors.

Results

1182 cases were explored, 112 patient (9%) had ER-/PR+, 749 (63,4%) had ER+/PR+, 92 (6%) had ER+/PR- and 229 (19,4%) were double negative. Compared with different groups of ER/PR expression all patients were younger at the time of diagnosis (median age 50 p=0,28 ). In comparison with ER+ the ER-/PR+ are most likely to be high grade (p<0,0001), in the other hand the ER-/PR+ groups are less likely to be high grade in comparison with double negative (p<0,0001). And more likely to have HER-2 over expressing/amplified tumors in comparison with the ER+ (p<0,0001). No significant difference was shown in tumor size (p=0,62), or with nodal metastases (p=0,17). As expected the majority of ER-/PR+ group received adjuvant endocrine therapy.

Conclusions

In our series the ER-/PR+ breast cancer present 9% confirmed by the literature (2,3%-9%). This phenotype is associated with high grade and HER-2 over expressing/amplification, and appears more in younger women, presenting an aggressive behavior. The ER-/PR+ tumor is a clinically distinct group and it may need a different treatment strategies.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Medical centre of biomedical and translational researchers and Anatomic pathology department, CHU Hassan II of FES.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.