Abstract CN9
Background
Prior research by the European Oncology Nursing Society (EONS) has provided evidence for significant differences in various dimension of cancer nursing across Europe. EONS Advocacy working group has developed the European Cancer Nursing Index (ECNI) to illustrate the status and better promote cancer nursing among political and/or health contexts.
Methods
Data on education and career development, patient and occupational safety, working conditions and impact, recognition and workforce statistics) were collected and (22 items) were divided into 5 dimensions (described above). from European cancer nurses through EONS survey on patient and occupational safety (n=491) and interviews conducted with leading cancer nurses (n=38). Eurostat and OECD work force statistics were also used. A scoring manual was developed (with scores 0- 100) by EONS Advocacy group. For items with varying responses from the same country, the most frequent was applied. Each of the 38 countries’ national cancer profile was scored according to the manual and was presented graphically on map charts (mapchart.net).
Results
Important differences between countries regarding the 5 dimensions was found. The mean total cancer nursing index score was 48 out of 100 and varied between 16-78, with the highest reported total score was from Ireland (78/100). In education and career development (mean=9, min-max =0-18) Norway, United Kingdom, The Netherlands and Ireland scored higher, in Patient and Occupational safety (mean=18, min-max =3-36) Germany and Belgium, and recognition (mean=8, min-max =0-15) Cyprus, Denmark and Sweden, while Bosnia and Switzerland ranked higher on working conditions and impact (mean=15, min-max =3-19).
Conclusions
The ECNI 2020 provides important information on the differences in cancer nursing profile across Europe. Cancer nursing needs to be strengthened in all European countries, to guarantee high quality and safe cancer care. It is recommended that the index be updated biannually to reflect progress and future developments.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
CN10 - Cancer nursing education and recognition in Europe: A survey by the European Oncology Nursing Society
Presenter: Patrick Crombez
Session: EONS13: Quality and safety of cancer nursing
Resources:
Abstract
Slides
Webcast
CN21 - Patient and occupational safety in Europe: A survey by the European Oncology Nursing Society
Presenter: Helena Ullgren
Session: EONS13: Quality and safety of cancer nursing
Resources:
Abstract
Slides
Webcast
Second victim: How to support cancer nurses after a harmful event
Presenter: René Schwendimann
Session: EONS13: Quality and safety of cancer nursing
Resources:
Slides
Webcast
EONS Safety work: Where do we go from here?
Presenter: Matthew Fowler
Session: EONS13: Quality and safety of cancer nursing
Resources:
Webcast
Novice Research Dissemination Award 1: Abstract CN42: Nurse and pharmacist-delivered gynaecology telephone clinic: maintenance therapies patient and staff survey
Presenter: Philippa Jupp
Session: EONS13: Quality and safety of cancer nursing
Resources:
Slides
Webcast
Novice Research Dissemination Award 2: Abstract CN46: Real-life experience of nurses coordinating device in oral therapy centre (DICTO program)
Presenter: Elise Deluche
Session: EONS13: Quality and safety of cancer nursing
Resources:
Slides
Webcast
Discussion and closing
Presenter: Andreas Charalambous
Session: EONS13: Quality and safety of cancer nursing
Resources:
Webcast