Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

E-Poster Display

1574P - The cognitive, affective, social and environmental drivers of inappropriate ovarian cancer screening: A survey of women and their clinicians using the theoretical domains framework

Date

17 Sep 2020

Session

E-Poster Display

Topics

Psychosocial Aspects of Cancer

Tumour Site

Presenters

Courtney Macdonald

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_4): S898-S902. 10.1016/annonc/annonc286

Authors

C. Macdonald1, D. Mazza2, M. Hickey3, M. Hunter4, L.A. Keogh5, S.C. Jones6, C. Saunders7, S. Nesci1, R.L. Milne8, S.A. McLachlan9, J. Hopper10, M. Friedlander11, J. Emery12, K.A. Phillips1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Department Of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 3000 - Melbourne/AU
  • 2 Department Of General Practice, Monash University, 3800 - Melbourne/AU
  • 3 Department Of Obstetrics And Gynaecology, University of Melbourne and the Royal Womens Hospital, 3000 - Melbourne/AU
  • 4 Centre For Biostatistics And Clinical Trials, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 3000 - Melbourne/AU
  • 5 Centre For Health Equity, Melbourne School Of Population And Global Health, University of Melbourne, 3010 - Melbourne/AU
  • 6 Acu Engagement, Australian Catholic University, 3065 - Melbourne/AU
  • 7 Department Of Surgical Oncology, University of Western Australia, 6009 - Perth/AU
  • 8 Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, 3004 - Melbourne/AU
  • 9 Department Of Medical Oncology, St Vincents Hospital, 3065 - Melbourne/AU
  • 10 Centre For Epidemiology And Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, 3000 - Melbourne/AU
  • 11 Department Of Medical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, 2031 - Randwick/AU
  • 12 Department Of General Practice, University of Melbourne, 3010 - Melbourne/AU

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1574P

Background

Ovarian cancer (OC) screening does not improve survival, thus most guidelines do not recommend it. This study examined why women and doctors screen for ovarian cancer contrary to guidelines.

Methods

Surveys, based on the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), were sent to women in the Kathleen Cuningham Foundation Consortium for Research into Familial Breast Cancer (kConFab) cohort, and family doctors (FDs) and gynaecologists who organised their screening.

Results

832 of 1,264 (66%) kConFab women responded. 80 (9.6%) had objectively elevated OC risk and 210 (25%) had elevated perceived risk. The majority of women (680, 82%) thought screening could detect early stage OC and 42% (348) disagreed that screening can lead to unnecessary tests/surgery. 126 (15%) had screened in the last two years. Most of these (101, 80%) would continue to screen even if their doctor told them it is ineffective. 48% of women that had screened did not have elevated perceived OC risk. For women, key OC screening motivators operated in the domains of social role and goals (staying healthy for family, 94%), emotion and reinforcement (peace of mind, 93%) and beliefs about capabilities (tests are easy to have, 92%). 252 of 531 (47%) clinicians responded; a minority (FDs 46%, gynaecologists 16%) thought OC screening was useful. 122 (64%) FDs and 30 (50%) gynaecologists had ordered screening in the last two years. For gynaecologists, the main motivators of OC screening operated in the domains of environmental context (lack of other screening options, 28%), and emotion (patient peace of mind, 17%, difficulty discontinuing screening, 14%). For FDs, the strongest motivators were in the domains of social influence (women ask for these tests, 21 %), goals (a chance these tests will detect cancer early, 16%), emotion (patient peace of mind, 14%) and environmental context (no other OC screening options, 11%).

Conclusions

Reasons for OC screening are patient driven. Clinician knowledge and practice are discordant. Motivators of OC screening encompass several behavioural domains, which need to be targeted in interventions to reduce inappropriate ovarian cancer screening.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre.

Funding

Cancer Australia and the National Breast Cancer Foundation.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.