Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

E-Poster Display

830P - Subanalysis of a randomized phase III study comparing trabectedin and PLD vs PLD alone in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC)

Date

17 Sep 2020

Session

E-Poster Display

Topics

Tumour Site

Ovarian Cancer

Presenters

Bradley Monk

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_4): S551-S589. 10.1016/annonc/annonc276

Authors

B.J. Monk1, T. Herzog2, T. McGowan3, B. De Rivas Otero4, J. Gomez5, A. Tanovic4, R.L. Coleman6

Author affiliations

  • 1 Gynecologic Oncology Department, Arizona Oncology (US Oncology Network), 85016 - Phoenix/US
  • 2 Gynecologic Oncology, University of Cincinnati Cancer Institute, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, 45219 - Cincinnati/US
  • 3 Janssen Scientific Affairs, Llc., Janssen, 19044 - Horsham/US
  • 4 Medical Affairs, PharmaMar, 28770 - Madrid/ES
  • 5 Clinical Oncology, PharmaMar, 28770 - Madrid/ES
  • 6 Gynecologic Oncology And Reproductive Medicine, The M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 77030-3721 - Houston/US

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 830P

Background

Trabectedin/PLD is approved in EU for patients with platinum-sensitive (PS) ROC. Monk et al (Gynecol Oncol 2020; NCT01846611) reported trabectedin/PLD vs PLD results in patients with ROC who progressed ≥6 months after 1st-line platinum and obtained a response to 2nd-line platinum. Based on an interim ad-hoc futility analysis requested by the IDMC, the study stopped early without survival benefit in the combination arm. For the original analysis, 266 events were considered (52% statistical power).

Methods

This post-hoc analysis evaluates the efficacy results (RECIST v.1.1) in the subset of women with a platinum-free interval (PFI) ≥6 months after the last platinum, instead of considering PFI after the first platinum as done in the original analysis.

Results

Overall 333 (57.8%) of patients included in the study had a PFI ≥6 months following the last platinum. Although, trabectedin/PLD did not result in longer survival, there was a trend towards a favorable progression-free survival (PFS), with a 6.4-week prolongation compared to PLD (10.0 vs. 8.4 months) and a significant improvement in objective response rate (ORR: 54.1% vs. 42.2%). Similarly to what was observed in the general population, a marked treatment benefit was observed with trabectedin/PLD in PS patients after last platinum line with a PFI 6-12 months and PS patients with BRCA1/2 mutations [trabectedin/PLD: n=48 vs PLD: n=52; OS: 47.8 vs 20.0 months, Hazard ratio (95% CI): 0.34 (0.17-0.67); PFS: 10.3 vs 7.6 months, 0.61 (0.37-1.02); ORR: 77.1% vs 44.2%, Odds ratio (95% CI): 4.24 (1.65-11.19), p=0.001]. Table: 830P

Trabectedin / PLD PLD Total
PFI after last platinum line, n (%) n=289 n=287 n=576
PFI <6 months 117 (40.5) 126 (43.9) 243 (42.2)
PFI ≥6 months 172 (59.5) 161 (56.1) 333 (57.8)
PS patients after last platinum line p
Median OS, months
PFI ≥6 months n=172 n=161
24.7 27.9
Hazard ratio (95% CI): 0.97 (0.69-1.36) 0.8621
PFI 6-12 months n=119 n=111
23.0 20.9
HR (95% CI): 0.84 (0.57-1.24) 0.3844
Median PFS, months
PFI ≥6 months n=172 n=161
10.0 8.4
HR (95% CI): 0.94 (0.71-1.24) 0.6626
PFI 6-12 months n=119 n=111
10.0 7.6
HR (95% CI): 0.84 (0.61-1.16) 0.2914
ORR, %
PFI ≥6 months n=172 n=161
54.1 42.2
Odds ratio (95% CI): 1.61 (1.02-2.54) 0.0371
PFI 6-12 months n=119 n=111
53.8 38.7
OR (95% CI): 1.84 (1.05-3.22) 0.0250

Conclusions

Among all patients included in the study, only 57.8% were PS after the last platinum, precluding a reliable estimation of PFS or OS. Despite that, there is a trend toward improved PFS combined with significant improvement in ORR with trabectedin/PLD in this subset of patients. More pronounced benefits were observed in PS patients with a PFI 6-12 months and PS patients with BRCA 1/2 mutations.

Clinical trial identification

NCT01846611.

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Janssen Research & Development.

Funding

This work was funded and supported by Janssen Research & Development. The present sub analysis was performed by PharmaMar.

Disclosure

B.J. Monk: Honoraria (institution), Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Janssen/Johnson&Johnson. T. Herzog: Advisory/Consultancy: AZ Pharmaceutical; Advisory/Consultancy: Caris; Advisory/Consultancy: Clovis; Advisory/Consultancy: Genentech; Advisory/Consultancy: GSK; Advisory/Consultancy: Merck; Advisory/Consultancy: Johnson & Johnson. T. McGowan: Shareholder/Stockholder/Stock options, Full/Part-time employment: Johnson&Johnson. B. De Rivas Otero: Full/Part-time employment: PharmaMar; Shareholder/Stockholder/Stock options, Full/Part-time employment: GSK. J. Gomez: Shareholder/Stockholder/Stock options, Full/Part-time employment: PharmaMar. A. Tanovic: Full/Part-time employment: PharmaMar. R.L. Coleman: Non-remunerated activity/ies, Elect President: IGCS; Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (self): AstraZeneca; Research grant/Funding (self): Clovis Oncology; Research grant/Funding (self): Esperance; Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (self): Genentech-Roche; Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (self): Janssen; Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (self): Merck; Research grant/Funding (self): OncoMed Pharmaceuticals; Research grant/Funding (self): USA National Cancer Institute; Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (self): AbbVie; Advisory/Consultancy: Aravive; Advisory/Consultancy: Curio Science; Advisory/Consultancy: Geistlich; Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (self): Genmab; Advisory/Consultancy: MoreHealth; Advisory/Consultancy: GSK; Advisory/Consultancy: Myriad; Advisory/Consultancy: Novocure; Advisory/Consultancy: Roche; Advisory/Consultancy: Tarveda Therapeutics, Inc; Advisory/Consultancy: Tempus Labs, Inc; Advisory/Consultancy: Tesaro; Research grant/Funding (institution): GOG Foundation, Inc.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.