Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

E-Poster Display

1048P - Should I stay or should I go: Optimal duration for antiPD(L)1 therapy

Date

17 Sep 2020

Session

E-Poster Display

Topics

Immunotherapy

Tumour Site

Presenters

Jeanne Chen

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_4): S645-S671. 10.1016/annonc/annonc279

Authors

J. Chen1, J. Arrondeau2, A. Jouinot3, P. Boudou Rouquette3, E. Fabre4, F. Giraud5, J. Chapron6, O. Huillard7, A. Lupo-Mansuet8, D. Damotte9, J. Alexandre10, M. Wislez11, F. Goldwasser12

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Oncology, Cochin University Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hopitaux De Paris, 75014 - Paris/FR
  • 2 Medical Oncology, Cochin University Hospital, Hôpital Cochin, 75014 - Paris/FR
  • 3 Medical Oncology, Cochin University Hospital, Hopital Cochin - Site Port-Royal AP-HP, 75014 - Paris/FR
  • 4 Medical Oncology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, 75015 - Paris/FR
  • 5 Pneumo-oncology, Hôpital Cochin, 75014 - Paris/FR
  • 6 Department Of Pneumology, Assistance Publique - Hopitaux De Paris, 75004 - Paris/FR
  • 7 Cancérologie, Hôpital Cochin, 75679 - Paris/FR
  • 8 Pathology, Hôpital Cochin, 75014 - Paris/FR
  • 9 Pathology, Université Paris Descartes, 75006 - Paris/FR
  • 10 Medical Onoclogy, Hôpital Cochin-Port Royal, 75014 - Paris/FR
  • 11 Pneumo-oncology, Hopital Cochin - Site Port-Royal AP-HP, 75020 - Paris/FR
  • 12 Batiment Copernic, Hôpital Cochin, 75014 - Paris/FR

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1048P

Background

Anti PD1(L)1 show improved overall survival (OS) benefits over conventional treatments in several cancer types. However, the optimal therapy duration for responder patients is still debated. This study aimed to provide real-life data across different tumor types after anti PD(L)1 discontinuation for patients who stopped immunotherapy without disease progression.

Methods

Data from patients treated at Cochin Hospital and Georges Pompidou European Hospital between January 2015 and December 2019 with anti PD(L)1 monotherapy, for whom treatment was discontinued within the first 2 years without disease progression were retrospectively analyzed. Long term outcomes and clinical and biological factors associated with survival were assessed. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used for survival analyses.

Results

At the time of analysis, 69 patients (51% NSCLC) treated with anti PD(L)1 had stopped therapy without disease progression, because of controlled disease (54%, including 26% of complete response (CR)), or adverse event (46%). The median treatment duration was 6.9 months (0.5-24.6). Median progression free survival after therapy discontinuation (dPFS) was 11.9 months, 95%CI [10.3-NA] and the median OS was not reached after a median follow up of 29 months. In univariate analysis, the type of response seemed to have an impact on OS (CR vs PR: HR 9.01, p = 0.036). A longer therapy duration was significantly associated with longer OS (HR 0.908, p=0.047). Discontinuation after 6 months was associated with longer dPFS (HR 0.506, p =0.0471) and OS (HR 0.3, p = 0.031) than within the first 6 months. Similar results were found among complete responders. Discontinuation because of adverse event rather than controlled disease was associated with shorter OS (HR 2.9; p=0.048). Secondary progression occurred in 36 patients (56%), of whom 21 received treatment rechallenge, with 33% ORR and 21% CR rate.

Conclusions

These results suggest that patients who do not experience disease progression and discontinue antiPD(L)1 therapy before 2 years may have long term benefits and can benefit from treatment rechallenge. Patients treated for less than 6 months seem to have poorer prognosis, even among complete responders.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

P. Boudou Rouquette: Officer/Board of Directors: Takeda; Officer/Board of Directors: BMS; Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Takeda; Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: PharmaMar. O. Huillard: Honoraria (self): Sanofi; Honoraria (self): BMS; Honoraria (self): AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self), Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Pfizer; Honoraria (self): Novartis; Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Roche; Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Astellas; Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Ipsen; Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Sanofi. M. Wislez: Honoraria (self): Roche; Honoraria (self): Pfizer; Honoraria (self): AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self): BMS; Honoraria (self): Boehringer Ingelheim. F. Goldwasser: Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Officer/Board of Directors: Baxter; Advisory/Consultancy, Officer/Board of Directors: Nutricia; Advisory/Consultancy, Officer/Board of Directors: Fresenius. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.