Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

E-Poster Display

1802P - Serum identification of MYC-amplification in small cell lung cancer patients using droplet digital PCR

Date

17 Sep 2020

Session

E-Poster Display

Topics

Tumour Site

Small Cell Lung Cancer

Presenters

Fionnuala Crowley

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_4): S974-S987. 10.1016/annonc/annonc290

Authors

F. Crowley1, H. Bye2, B. Macanovic3, P. O Dea3, D.G. Power3, A.R. Minchom4, M. Hubank2, D. Collins3

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Oncology, CUH - Cork University Hospital, P85 - Cork/IE
  • 2 Nihr Centre For Molecular Pathology, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton., SM2PT - Surrey/GB
  • 3 Medical Oncology, CUH - Cork University Hospital, Cork/IE
  • 4 Drug Development Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research/Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, SM2 5PT - Sutton/GB

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1802P

Background

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) comprises approximately 15% of all lung cancers. It has a poor prognosis with a median overall survival (OS) of 7 months. Comprehensive genomic analyses of SCLC have reported MYC-amplification as a frequent oncogenic event in up to 30% of tumours and this correlates with an aggressive tumour phenotype and reduced OS. MYC status therefore has a prognostic role and is a potential future biomarker of response and/or treatment.

Methods

Recruitment for this study is ongoing. Blood from newly diagnosed or relapsed SCLC patients was analysed for circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA). Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) detected the presence/absence of MYC C/L/N amplifications in ctDNA. A result was reported as amplified if ratio of MYC gene/reference gene was >2. Borderline amplified was reported if ratio was 1.5-2. MYC amplifications were correlated with clinicopathological details and OS.

Results

Currently 30 patients have been recruited to this ongoing study. Results for the first 14 patients are presented. Half the patients were male with a median age of 65 years. The majority (86%) were newly diagnosed. Most patients (86%) were ECOG 0, 1 or 2. ddPCR results revealed two patients had MYC-Lamplifications (ratios 2.98 and 9.95). One additional patient had borderline MYC-C amplification (ratio 1.83). Both patients with MYC-L amplified ctDNA presented with superior vena cava obstruction and were both T4N3 at time of diagnosis. Both are undergoing first-line chemotherapy and no radiological assessment has been performed to date.

Conclusions

SCLC has a dismal prognosis with a dire need to improve treatment options. We have high number of SCLC patients in our centre in Ireland. These patients can deteriorate quickly and become ineligible for clinical trials which require pre-screening. MYC amplification may not only offer prognostic information but is indirectly targetable, in addition to direct MYC inhibitors in development. Real time ddPCR of ctDNA in patient plasma is an effective, cost-efficient method for serum identification of MYC amplification with results available within 3-5 days of blood draw, permitting complex pre-screening in a timely manner to allow prognostication, trial recruitment and a future actionable mutation.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Cork University Hospital.

Funding

Breakthrough Cancer research Charity, University College Cork.

Disclosure

H. Bye: Full/Part-time employment: AstraZeneca. A.R. Minchom: Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy: Loxo Oncology; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy: Janssen Pharmaceuticals; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy: Faron Pharmaceuticals; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy: Bayer Pharmaceuticals; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy: Novartis Oncology; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy: Merck Pharmaceuticals. M. Hubank: Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy: Roche; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy: AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy: Bristol-Myers Squibb; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy: Guardant Health; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy: Boehringer Ingelheim. D. Collins: Honoraria (self): Pfizer; Honoraria (self), Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Genmab; Honoraria (self), Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self): Eli Lilly; Honoraria (self), Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Roche; Advisory/Consultancy, Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: MSD; Advisory/Consultancy: Seattle Genetics. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.