Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

E-Poster Display

1684P - Scientia Potentia Est: How the Italian world of oncology changes in the COVID-19 pandemic

Date

17 Sep 2020

Session

E-Poster Display

Topics

COVID-19 and Cancer

Tumour Site

Presenters

Zelmira Ballatore

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_4): S934-S973. 10.1016/annonc/annonc289

Authors

Z. Ballatore, L. Bastianelli, F. Merloni, N. Ranallo, L. Cantini, L. Mariotti, A. Lucarelli, M. Burattini, R. Berardi

Author affiliations

  • Department Of Oncology, Università Politecnica delle Marche, AOU Ospedali Riuniti, 60126 - Ancona/IT

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1684P

Background

After COVID-19 was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization, a response from the Italian Health System to react to an unprecedented condition became necessary and sudden. COVID-19 pandemic required oncologists to redefine clinical organization and management of cancer patients. The aim of our study was to take a picture of the situation of Italian oncologies and to evaluate the difficulties in patients management.

Methods

Between 18th March and 9th April 2020 we conducted an online survey (Google Forms). It consisted of 45 questions ranging from individual perception of pandemic management by oncological centers to physicians and nurses psychological distress and patient care. The survey was anonymous and broadcasted to oncology health workers by mailing contacts, word of mouth and social networks.

Results

A total of 383 oncology health workers participated in the survey. The majority was female (72%) and from central Italy (46%). Impressively, a total of 357 (93%) participants declared the Oncologic Department reorganized routine clinical activity, but only 41% was adequately trained about the required procedures. 20% of the survey attendees think they have not received adequate and timely protective devices with respect to clinical needs and according to 58% the supply of these devices was only partial. 34% of professionals declared they do not have or know a defined common guideline to reschedule patients’ treatments. More than 80% of interviewees declared to feel worry about being at greater risk of contagion than the general population, 92% feared to transmit virus to family members. Deferring treatments has caused fear / anxiety in 228 of the interviewed (60%). Symptoms of stressful situations emerged with a deterioration in sleep quality in 62% of professionals, worsening of mood (69%) and lower concentration ability (49%).

Conclusions

Our survey demonstrated the flexibility of oncologic teams. However, the emergency response quality has been heterogeneous, and several drawbacks emerged from this first analysis. Information, protection, testing, and training of healthcare professionals are keywords that should be kept in mind to encourage recovery after this tragedy and to be ready to face a similar emergency in the next future.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.