Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

E-Poster Display

232P - Safety of fertility treatments in breast cancer survivors

Date

17 Sep 2020

Session

E-Poster Display

Topics

Tumour Site

Breast Cancer

Presenters

Margherita Condorelli

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_4): S303-S339. 10.1016/annonc/annonc267

Authors

M. Condorelli1, M. De Vos2, S. Lie Fong3, C. Autin4, A. Delvigne5, F. Vanden Meerschaut6, C. Wyns7, R. Imbert8, C. Cheruy9, J. Bouziotis10, M. Lambertini11, I. Demeestere1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Fertility Clinic, Erasme University Hospital-(Universite Libre de Bruxelles), 1070 - Brussels/BE
  • 2 Centre For Reproductive Medicine (crg), University Hospital Brussels - Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1090 - Brussels/BE
  • 3 Leuven University Fertility Centre, University Hospitals Leuven, 3000 - Leuven/BE
  • 4 Département De Gynécologie-obstétrique, CHU Saint-Pierre, 1000 - Brussels/BE
  • 5 Centre De Procréation Médicalement Assistée, Clinique CHC MontLégia, 4000 - Liège/BE
  • 6 Department For Reproductive Medicine, University Hospital Ghent, 9000 - Ghent/BE
  • 7 Cliniques Universitaires Saint-luc, Université catholique de Louvain, 1200 - Brussels/BE
  • 8 Centre De Procréation Médicalement Assistée, CHIREC, 1160 - Brussels/BE
  • 9 Gynécologie-obstétrique, Centre hospitalier de l'Ardenne, 6800 - Libramont/BE
  • 10 Service De La Recherche Biomedicale, Erasme University Hospital-(Universite Libre de Bruxelles), 1070 - Brussels/BE
  • 11 U.o.c. Clinica Di Oncologia Medica, University of Genova – IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 - Genova/IT

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 232P

Background

Several studies have demonstrated the safety of pregnancy in breast cancer (BC) survivors. However, many patients face infertility after (neo)adjuvant BC therapy and require fertility treatments (FT). The safety of FT after BC remission remains undefined due to the poor evidence on the prognostic impact of increased estrogen exposure not followed by anticancer treatments. Therefore, the safety of FT in BC survivors has become a research priority.

Methods

This is a retrospective multicenter study including BC survivors of less than 40 years at BC diagnosis who underwent FT between January 2006 and December 2016 with ≥ 2 years of follow-up after FT. They were compared to a non-exposed (NE) group of BC survivors who did not perform FT, matched (2:1) for BRCA status, BC stage, anticancer treatment, length of disease-free period (not inferior to the time between BC diagnosis and first FT in the FT group), and age at diagnosis when feasible. Exclusion criteria were: stage IV at diagnosis, BC during pregnancy, pre-existing neoplasia or ovarian failure. FT included controlled ovarian stimulation, clomiphene citrate, and hormone replacement therapy for embryo transfer.

Results

A total of 39 eligible patients were matched with 73 NE patients. There was no statistical difference between the two groups for BRCA mutation status, stage, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, HER2 status, use of chemotherapy or adjuvant endocrine therapy. Differences were observed for age (mean 31.8 (3.9) vs.34.2 (3.6) years in FT and NE groups, respectively; P< 0.001) and nulliparity at diagnosis (89.7% vs.46.6%, respectively; P< 0.001). Median follow-up time from BC diagnosis was 9 (4 – 22) and 12 (6 – 19) years in the FT and NE groups, respectively (P= 0.004). FT were performed at a mean age of 37.1 (4.6) years old. During FT, median estrogen peak level was 696.5 pg/ml (139.7 – 4130). In the FT group, 59% conceived after BC vs.26% in NE group (P= 0.001). BC relapsed in 7.7% versus 20.5% women in FT and NE groups (OR 2.88, 95% CI 0.81 – 10.2, P= 0.10); time to relapse was 6.7 (2.5) vs.7.5 (3.0) years after the initial BC diagnosis, respectively (P= 0.65).

Conclusions

This is the largest cohort study with the longest follow-up providing reassuring data regarding the use of FT in BC survivors who had an unfulfilled desire for pregnancy.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Erasme University Hospital (Universite Libre de Bruxelles).

Funding

Télévie- FNRS Fonds Erasme.

Disclosure

M. De Vos: Advisory/Consultancy, outside the submitted work: CooperSurgical; Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, outside the submitted work: MSD; Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, outside the submitted work: Gedeon-Richter; Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, outside the submitted work: Ferring. M. Lambertini: Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, outside the submitted work: Roche; Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, outside the submitted work: Theramex; Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, outside the submitted work: Takeda; Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, outside the submitted work: Lilly. I. Demeestere: Advisory/Consultancy, outside the submitted work: Roche; Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, outside the submitted work: Novartis. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.