Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

E-Poster Display

209P - Safety of autologous fat grafting in breast cancer: A multicenter Italian study among 17 Senonetwork Breast Units

Date

17 Sep 2020

Session

E-Poster Display

Topics

Tumour Site

Breast Cancer

Presenters

Agnese Losurdo

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_4): S303-S339. 10.1016/annonc/annonc267

Authors

A. Losurdo1, M. Klinger2, A.V.E. Lisa2, E. Morenghi3, F. Corsi4, C. Leonardi5, S. Santicchia6, A. Loreti7, M.A. Bocchiotti8, F. Guerini9, P.C. Parodi10, V. Vindigni11, V. Guarneri12, G. Papaccio13, G. Meneghini14, P. Persichetti15, A. Aquinati16, L. Ciuffreda17, C. Tinterri18, A. Santoro1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Division Of Oncology & Hematology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, 20089 - Milan/IT
  • 2 Plastic Surgery Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan/IT
  • 3 Division Of Biostatistics, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, 20089 - Milan/IT
  • 4 Department Of Biomedical And Clinical Sciences, Luigi Sacco, Università di Milano, Milan/IT
  • 5 Division Of Radiotherapy, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan/IT
  • 6 Division Of Breast Surgery, Breast Unit Rimini-Santarcangelo, Rimini/IT
  • 7 Department Of Plastic Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera San Giovanni Addolorata, Rome/IT
  • 8 Department Of Plastic Surgery, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin/IT
  • 9 Department Of Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia/IT
  • 10 Department Of Plastic Surgery, Academic Hospital, Udine/IT
  • 11 Department Of Plastic Surgery, Università di Padova, Padua/IT
  • 12 Department Of Surgery, Oncology And Gastroenterology Dept., Istituto Oncologico Veneto IRCCS, 35128 - Padova/IT
  • 13 Department Of Surgery, Breast Unit Veneziana, Venice/IT
  • 14 Department Of Surgery, Breast Unit Azienda ULSS8 Berica, Vicenza/IT
  • 15 Plastic And Reconstructive Surgery Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome/IT
  • 16 Department Of Plastic Surgery, Centro Studi di Ricerca e Formazione in Chirurgia Rigenerativa, Ancona/IT
  • 17 Department Of Surgery, IRCCS Fondazione Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, Foggia/IT
  • 18 Division Of Breast Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, 20089 - Milan/IT

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 209P

Background

Treatment of early stage breast cancer (BC) has evolved in its multidisciplinary approach, comprising surgery, radiotherapy and oncoplastic reconstruction. Autologous fat grafting (AFG), defined as the re-implant to the breast of fat tissue from different body areas, has been firstly applied to aesthetic plastic surgery and then used in reconstructive surgery, mainly for scar correction, nipple reconstruction and opposite breast altering to achieve a balanced appearance. Nevertheless, due to the potentially unsafe stem-like properties of adipocytes at the tumoral bed level, no clear evidence of the procedure’s safety, in terms of oncological relapse, has been clearly documented so far.

Methods

We retrospectively collected data of early BC patients from 17 Italian Breast Units, followed from January 1997 to March 2018, and assessed differences in terms of locoregional recurrence rate (LRR) and locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS) between patients who underwent AFG and patients who did not. The primary end-point of the study was equivalence of LRR, between AFG and non-AFG groups. A LR difference within 5%, with a bilateral alpha error of 5% and 80% power was considered as equivalent. Differences were analyzed in the entire cohort of invasive tumors and in different subgroups, according to prognostic biological subtypes.

Results

Among the 6703 evaluable invasive BC, 2227 (33.2%) underwent AFG procedure and 4476 (66.8%) did not. With a median follow-up time of 65 months, LRR was 5.3% in the global population, 4.4% in the AFG group and 5.7% in the non-AFG group, suggesting no difference between the two groups (p=0.021, HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.51-0.82). No significant differences in terms of LRFS were also documented among different biological subtypes (luminal-like group, HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.29-0.87, p=0.015; luminal HER2, HR 0.19, 95% CI 0.04-0.83, p=0.027; HER2 enriched-like, HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.12-3.02, p=0.544; and TNBC, HR 0.02, 95% CI 0.005-0.12, p<0.001).

Conclusions

Our study consolidates previous data on AFG oncological safety, confirming, in a very large, multicenter cohort of early BC patients that, besides the well-known benefits on the aesthetic result, AFG does not interfere negatively on cancer prognosis.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.