Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

E-Poster Display

1241P - Safety monitoring of adjuvant 2 weekly durvalumab for patients with stage III NSCLC: Implications for a 4 weekly regimen during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond

Date

17 Sep 2020

Session

E-Poster Display

Topics

Immunotherapy

Tumour Site

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Presenters

Kroopa Joshi

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_4): S744-S753. 10.1016/annonc/annonc263

Authors

K. Joshi, A. Muhith, C. Milner-Watts, M. Obeid, S. Khakoo, J. Bhosle, A.R. Minchom, M. O'Brien

Author affiliations

  • Medical Oncology, The Royal Marsden NHS Trust, SM25PT - Sutton/GB

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1241P

Background

Durvalumab, an anti-PD-L1 agent, is approved for use as an adjuvant treatment of patients with stage III NSCLC previously treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy scheduled as two-weekly infusions for one year. The COVID-19 pandemic has necessitated a move to remote monitoring of patients via telephone consultations, and a need to reduce hospital visits for patient treatment. It is however, imperative that drug safety is not compromised.

Methods

We carried out a retrospective study of 40 patients treated with 2 weekly infusions of durvalumab at The Royal Marsden Hospital between November 2018 and March 2020, prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. A total of 216 hospital visits were analysed. The number of adverse events requiring investigation or intervention were reviewed and the clinical consult documentation analysed.

Results

All 40 patients included in the study were diagnosed with Stage III NSCLC (adenocarcinoma 25/40, squamous 9/40, other 6/40) and were previously treated with chemoradiotherapy. The median number of hospital visits analysed per patient was 5. An adverse event leading to a medical intervention (concomitant medication commenced or altered, further unplanned imaging booked, referral to a non-oncology specialist) occurred in 24 out of 216 (11.1%) hospital visits. We observed a clinically significant abnormal blood test result in 8/216 (3.7%) visits. In 10/216 (4.6%) visits, durvalumab was either discontinued due to significant toxicity (5/10) or due to disease progression (5/10). On review of the doctors documentation from each clinic visit we assessed that the majority 184/216 (85.2%) of face-to-face consultations could have been safely performed via telephone with signs and symptoms elicited via verbal conversation rather than clinical examination.

Conclusions

In conclusion, patients receiving two weekly durvalumab can safely be assessed via a telephone consultation with a face-to-face consultation and blood test required in a minority of patients. Given our findings, we have now moved to 4 weekly infusions of durvalumab as permitted during the COVID-19 pandemic without a mid-cycle consultation or blood test, thereby minimising the number of hospital visits for patients with cancer.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.