Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

E-Poster Display

1456P - Retrospective comparative analysis of S-1 and oxaliplatin or cisplatin as first-line therapy in metastatic gastric cancer in a European population

Date

17 Sep 2020

Session

E-Poster Display

Topics

Tumour Site

Gastric Cancer

Presenters

Anna Koumarianou

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_4): S841-S873. 10.1016/annonc/annonc284

Authors

A. Koumarianou1, A. Ntavatzikos1, C. Vallilas2, K. Kampoli1, Z. Kokosaiou2, M.V. Karamouzis2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Hematology Oncology Unit, 4th Internal Medicine Department, Attikon University Hospital, 12462 - Athens/GR
  • 2 Department Of Biological Chemistry, School of Medicine, University of Athens, 106 76 - Kolonaki (Athens)/GR

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1456P

Background

The efficacy of S-1 combined with a platinum agent in the first-line setting and in patients with advanced gastric cancer has been previously demonstrated in randomized clinical trials. However, real-world evidence on effectiveness in European populations remains limited.

Methods

In the present study, we reviewed the data of a European cohort of patients with advanced gastric cancer treated with first-line therapy including S-1 combination with a platinum agent according to established schedules.

Results

48 patients (29 with locally advanced/inoperable and 19 with metastatic disease) were treated with S-1 plus a platinum agent. The clinicopathologic data and outcomes are shown in Table. The multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that the use of cisplatin as compared to oxaliplatin was associated with worse survival and increased risk of death [PFS HR: 2.791; (CI 95%:1.326-5.875); p=0.007 and OS HR:9.272; (CI 95%:1.336-64.33); p=0.024]. Similarly, tumor grade III versus II was associated with worse survival [PFS HR: 3.009; (CI 95%:1.340-6.760); p=0.008 and OS HR: 3.736; (CI 95%:1.158-12.06); p=0.027]. Four SAEs GIII where recorded (1 fatigue, 1 neutropenia, 1 anemia, 1 diarrhea) in 3 patients. Table: 1456P

Clinicopathologic data and outcomes

n (%) Oxaliplatin + S-1 Cisplatin + S-1
48 (100) 33 (100) 15 (100)
Median Age (range) 63 (24-84) 60 (24-84) 66 (47-81)
Male 37 (77,1) 25 (75.8) 12 (80,0)
Stomach primary 25 (52,1) 14 (42.4) 11 (73.3)
Gastroesophageal primary 23 (47,9) 19 (57.6) 4 (26.7)
Grade II 17 (35,4) 11 (33.3) 6 (40.0)
Grade III 31 (64,6) 22 (66.7) 9 (60.0)
Adjuvant Chemotherapy 5 (10.4) 5 (15.2) 0 (0.0)
Best response
CR 6 (12,5) 6 (18.2) 0 (0.0)
PR 14 (29,2) 9 (27.3) 5 (33.3)
SD 12 (25,0) 9 (27.3) 3 (20.0)
PD 15 (31,3) 8 (24.2) 7 (46.7)
1yr OS 55,9% 81.4% 22.5%
mOS m (95%CI) 14,6 (8,4-20,8) 24.7 (10.1-39.3) 5.4 (3.9-6.8)
1-yr PFS 18,1% 18.9% 13.3%
mPFS m (95%CI) 5.1 (3. 7-6,5) 8.4 (5.0-11.9) 3.7 (1.4-6.0)
.

Conclusions

S-1 combination with a platinum agent in the first-line setting of European patients with advanced gastric cancer results in similar survival outcomes and toxicity with previously reported data from Asian populations. S-1 combination with oxaliplatin is associated with superior efficacy as compared to cisplatin.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.