Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

E-Poster Display

1870P - Response of post-curative survivors suffering from fatigue to a multimodal inpatient cancer rehabilitation program

Date

17 Sep 2020

Session

E-Poster Display

Topics

Supportive Care and Symptom Management

Tumour Site

Presenters

Florian Strasser

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_4): S988-S1017. 10.1016/annonc/annonc291

Authors

F. Strasser1, E.B. Schmidt2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Integrated Cancer Rehabilitation And Cancer Fatigue Clinic, Klinik Gais AG, 9056 - Gais/CH
  • 2 Department Of Oncology, Internal Medicine & Palliative Care Center, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, 9007 - St. Gallen/CH

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1870P

Background

Cancer-treatment related Fatigue is a frequent and distressing consequence of anticancer treatment. Multimodal interventions are required (see ESMO CPGL 2020), however, little is known about the effects of structured inpatient cancer rehabilitation programs including both physical and emotional-social components.

Methods

Prospective data collection of inpatients of an integrated cancer rehabilitation service including weekly assessments for goal-directed rehabilitation interventions, steered by a transprofessional rehabilitation team. Rehab-Intervention includes: endurance training incl. water-therapy, proteinrich nutrition, invisible disability directed psychooncolocigal, art and music therapy, mind-body interventions, cognitive-behavioural training to cope with energy levels, social support for back to work and meaning-centered group therapy. Definition of endurance-training responders and non-responders based on five-time-sit-to-stand test. Testing the hypothesis that endurance-training non-responders profit from rehab in the psycho-social domains. Descriptive statistics and t-tests.

Results

Fifty-six patients (54y [31-88], 42 female, BMI 27 [median; 16, 42]; breast (29), lung (4), GI (7), GU (5), HemOnc (9), or other (1) cancer) had chemo/immuntherapy 387 (0, 3678) days before rehab. LOS 29 days (0, 53). Co-factors: CINP 22 (8 >= G2), depression/psychiatric comorbidity (39), endocrine (11) or chronic pain (26). FTSTS: 9.1 sec (4.8; 30), Hand-Grip-Strength 25 / 23 kg, 6 min walking-test 493 meters (58, 661). Brief-Fatigue Inventory 45/90 (0, 74), Fatigue 7/10 (0, 10), cognitive 5, emotional 4, physical 7; QoL 5 (0, 10). HADS-A 7/21 (0, 18), HADS-D 8/21 (0, 18). After Rehab: FTSTS 6.1 (-36%), 6MWT 568, HADS-A 4.5, HADS-D 5; BFI 25, Fatigue 4, cogn 3, emot 1, phys 3. All physical and psychological outcomes improved clinically meaningful in "fit” (non-responding by FTSTS) and unfit patients.

Conclusions

Cancer-treatment related fatigue syndrome rehabilitation is both effective in endurance training responders and non-responders fpr psychological and social outcomes. Further research is justified testing different types of interventions tailored to subgroups.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.