Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

E-Poster Display

511P - Real-world survival outcomes of Asian metastatic colorectal cancer patients undergoing hepatectomy from the AsianmCRCRegistry

Date

17 Sep 2020

Session

E-Poster Display

Topics

Tumour Site

Colon and Rectal Cancer

Presenters

Catherine Teh

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_4): S409-S461. 10.1016/annonc/annonc270

Authors

C. Teh1, S. Cai2, J. Lin3, Y.S. Park4, T.W. Kim5, E. Sirachainan6, B. Ma7, J. Wang8, W.T. Chen9, H. Wang10, C. Chen11, J.Y. Baek12, S. Zhang13, S. S P14, J. Xu15, S. Shrikhande16, J. Lee17, B. Jia18, Y. He19, J. Huang20

Author affiliations

  • 1 Hpb Surgery, Makati Medical Center, 1229 - Makati/PH
  • 2 Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 200032 - Shanghai/CN
  • 3 Division Of Colon And Rectal Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, 112 - Taipei/TW
  • 4 Division Of Hematology-oncology, Department Of Internal Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 06351 - Seoul/KR
  • 5 Medical Oncology, Asan Medical Center, Seoul/KR
  • 6 Clinical Onology, Ramathibodi Hospital, 10400 - Bangkok/TH
  • 7 Clinical Oncology, Prince Of Wales Hospital, 110 - Hong Kong/HK
  • 8 Colorectal Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, 80756 - Kaohsiung City/TW
  • 9 Surgery, China Medical University Hospital, 404 - Taichung/TW
  • 10 Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital Journal, 40705 - Taichung/TW
  • 11 Surgery, Koo Foundation Sun Yat-Sen Cancer Center, 251 - Taipei/TW
  • 12 Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center, Korea, 110 - Goyang/KR
  • 13 Colorectal Surgery, Zhejiang University Second Hospital Colorectal Center, 110 - Hang Zhou/CN
  • 14 Surgical Oncology, Manipal Hospital, Manipal Comprehensive Cancer Center, Bangalore, 560017 - Bengaluru/IN
  • 15 Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 111 - Shanghai/CN
  • 16 Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital Parel Mumbai, 400012 - Mumbai/IN
  • 17 Surgery, National Cheng-Kung University Hospital, 704 - Taipei/TW
  • 18 Surgical Oncology, Chinese Pla General Hospital, Medical School Of Pla, 110 - Beijing/CN
  • 19 Department Of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital Of Sun Yat-Sen University, 110 - Guangzhou/CN
  • 20 Oncology, Merck Pte Ltd, Singapore/SG

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 511P

Background

The AsianmCRCRegistry is a prospective, open-label, multicentre data collection registry aimed to identify the most significant survival trends amongst Asian patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

Methods

A total of 843 mCRC patients were enrolled in the registry from 31 centres across 8 Asian countries from 06 January 2013 to 09 February 2017. Of these, 214 underwent liver resection.

Results

A total of 67.76% (n=145/214) patients underwent limited hepatectomy and 32.24 % (n=69/214) patients underwent major hepatectomy. Log-rank test on Kaplan Meier curves showed that 5-year overall survival (OS) was significantly higher for patients presenting with a colon diagnosis vs metastatic diagnosis (63% vs 30%; P=0.012), in patients with 1-3 metastases vs >3 metastases (74% vs 23%; P<0.0001), size of metastases <50 mm vs ≥50 mm (42% vs 28%; P=0.013), presence of concomitant extrahepatic disease vs absence (4-year OS was 77% vs 19%; P<0.0001), initial resectability vs unresectability (77% vs 47%; P=0.071), metachronous vs synchronous metastases (69% vs 26%; P<0.0001), unilateral vs bilateral localization (63% vs 19%; P<0.0001), response to last pre-operative chemotherapy (3-yr OS was 100% for CR and for SD, 90% for PR and 59% for disease progression; P=0.048), liver-curative intent at outset vs not (4-yr OS was 72% vs 21%; P=0.0002) and globally-curative intent at outset vs not(76% vs 34%; P=0.0002). Among patients who had targeted biologics as the last line of treatment prior to R0 resection, 75.86% (n=22/29) had PR, 10.34% (n=3/29) had either no change or disease progression and 3.25% (n=1/29) had CR. All patients who received cetuximab prior to R0 resection (n=14) had PR. A total of 42.68% patients receiving cetuximab+chemotherapy underwent R0R1 resection compared with 35.77% patients receiving bevacizumab+chemotherapy. 62.70% (n=153/214) of patients did not have any recurrence after hepatectomy. At last follow-up, 32.24% (n=69/214) of patients were alive and disease-free. Grade 1 adverse effects (AEs) were experienced by 14.29% of patients, 4.08% had grade 2 AEs, 4.08% had grade 3b AEs, & 2.04% had grade 4a AEs.

Conclusions

This study expands our understanding of real-world survival patterns of Asian mCRC patients undergoing hepatectomy.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Medical writing support provided by Dr. Pratishtha B Chaudhari from WriterMD Medical Writing Consultancy.

Legal entity responsible for the study

Dr. Catherine Teh, Makati Medical Center, Makati.

Funding

Merck Pte Ltd.

Disclosure

J. Huang: Full/Part-time employment: Merck Pte Ltd. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.