Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

E-Poster Display

1457P - Real-world survival in advanced gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma with best supportive care

Date

17 Sep 2020

Session

E-Poster Display

Topics

Tumour Site

Gastric Cancer

Presenters

Kirsty Cavanagh

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_4): S841-S873. 10.1016/annonc/annonc284

Authors

K.E. Cavanagh, M. Baxter, R. Petty

Author affiliations

  • School Of Medicine, University of Dundee, DD1 9SY - Dundee/GB

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1457P

Background

Real-world data is lacking on survival in advanced gastro-oesophageal (aGO) cancer patients treated with best supportive care (BSC) only. This knowledge is vital to personalise cancer treatment and obtain truly informed consent. This study aimed to define and compare survival in aGO cancer patients treated with and without palliative chemotherapy (CTx), and to explore the factors that impact prognosis.

Methods

Patients in NHS Tayside, Scotland, diagnosed with aGO adenocarcinoma (defined as non-resectable) between 01/01/2016-31/12/2017 were identified retrospectively. Clinical data was obtained from electronic records. For both groups, survival was defined as date of diagnosis to date of death. Patients in the BSC group either chose not to have CTx or were deemed not suitable. Kaplan-Meier analysis for survival was performed to determine median overall survival (mOS) and Cox Regression analysis used to determine contributing factors. Local ethical approval was obtained.

Results

116 eligible patients were identified. There was a significant difference in mOS between patients in the BSC and CTx groups (93 days(d) vs 274 days, p<0.001). This was maintained when those deemed not fit for CTx were removed. One-year survival was 18.7% v 34.1% (p=0.063). Cox regression analysis in the BSC group identified stage (p<0.001) and performance status (PS) (p=0.021) as having independent predictive value for survival. Age was not related to outcome. Those with palliative stents, n= 31, had a mOS 137d v 56d for those who did not, n=44 (p=0.219). Table: 1457P

BSC (n=75) CTx (n=41) P-value
Age (SD) 80 (9.03) 66 (10.94) <0.0001
Gender; M:F (%) 64%:36% 78%:22% 0.118
Stage 4 (%) 42.7% 70.7% 0.015
PS 0-2 (%) 72% 97.6% <0.0001
mOS (95% CI) days 93 (60-126) 274 (221-327) <0.0001
mOS PS 0-2 (95% CI) days 115 (53-177) 274 (222-326) <0.0001
1-year OS (%) 18.7% 34.1% 0.063

Conclusions

To our knowledge, this is the largest reported study in Europe of outcomes in GO cancer patients treated with BSC only. The mOS with BSC is approximately 3 months. Cancer stage and ECOG PS has a role in prognostication in this setting. Our findings support the benefit of palliative chemotherapy in this population and real-world survival corresponds to published trial data.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Professor Russell Petty.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

R. Petty: Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Bristol-Myers Squibb; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (self), Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Lilly; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Pfizer Pharmaceuticals Israel; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Sanofi; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy: Servier Laboratories Ltd; Research grant/Funding (self), Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: AstraZeneca; Research grant/Funding (self): Boston Biomedical; Research grant/Funding (self): Clovis Oncology; Research grant/Funding (self), Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Five Prime Therapeutics; Research grant/Funding (self): Janssen; Research grant/Funding (self): Merck Serono; Research grant/Funding (self): MSD Brazil; Research grant/Funding (self): Roche. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.